On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 2:48 PM Veit Heller wrote:
> As another point of consideration, I also contributed changes to
> PyWavelets, Pandas, and scikit-image to replace all occurrences of `np.fix`
> with `np.trunc`, so that might also help further things along.
>
Thanks a lot for those contributi
As another point of consideration, I also contributed changes to PyWavelets,
Pandas, and scikit-image to replace all occurrences of `np.fix` with
`np.trunc`, so that might also help further things along.
I would have made more broad contributions, but GitHub unfortunately limits the
number of s
On Mon, Nov 10, 2025, at 11:29, Ralf Gommers via NumPy-Discussion wrote:
> I agree with this concern. It's not *that* much and the code is trivially
> fixable by replacing `fix` with `trunc`. So a slow deprecation with removal
> in a 3.0 release would already be quite conservative compared to our
On Sat, Nov 8, 2025 at 12:15 PM sebastian
wrote:
> On 2025-11-07 02:58, Stefan van der Walt via NumPy-Discussion wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 3, 2025, at 12:29, Nathan via NumPy-Discussion wrote:
> >
> >> Ralf rightly pointed out
> >>
> > (https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/30098#pullrequestreview-340
On 2025-11-07 02:58, Stefan van der Walt via NumPy-Discussion wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2025, at 12:29, Nathan via NumPy-Discussion wrote:
Ralf rightly pointed out
(https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/30098#pullrequestreview-3408343827)
that np.fix does have substantial downstream usage and that
On Thu, Nov 6, 2025 at 6:59 PM Stefan van der Walt
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2025, at 12:29, Nathan via NumPy-Discussion wrote:
>
> Ralf rightly pointed out (
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/30098#pullrequestreview-3408343827)
> that np.fix does have substantial downstream usage and that a de
On Mon, Nov 3, 2025, at 12:29, Nathan via NumPy-Discussion wrote:
> Ralf rightly pointed out
> (https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/30098#pullrequestreview-3408343827) that
> np.fix does have substantial downstream usage and that a deprecation needs to
> go through the mailing list, so I'm raisi
Done: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/30168
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3//lists/numpy-discussion.python.org
Member a
I agree. We haven’t heard any objections to this proposal. Joren, why don’t
you open a PR to add the pending deprecation to the type stubs?
On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 11:46 PM matti picus via NumPy-Discussion <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2025 at 12:40 AM Joren Hammudoglu
On Tue, Nov 4, 2025 at 12:40 AM Joren Hammudoglu via NumPy-Discussion <
[email protected]> wrote:
> How about we decorate np.fix in the stubs (and only in the stubs) with
>
> @deprecated("will be deprecated in 2.5",
> category=PendingDeprecationWarning)
> def fix(...): ...
>
> and put th
How about we decorate np.fix in the stubs (and only in the stubs) with
@deprecated("will be deprecated in 2.5", category=PendingDeprecationWarning)
def fix(...): ...
and put that in 2.4.0?
[docs](https://typing-extensions.rtfd.io/#typing_extensions.deprecated)
That way static type-checkers will
11 matches
Mail list logo
