Re: [Numpy-discussion] Roadmap proposal, v3

On Thu, 2018-08-02 at 05:47 -0700, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Stefan van der Walt ey.edu> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Please take a look at the latest roadmap proposal: > > > > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/11611 > > > > This is a living document, so

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Roadmap proposal, v3

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Stefan van der Walt wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Please take a look at the latest roadmap proposal: > > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/11611 > > This is a living document, so can easily be modified in the future, but > we'd like to get in place a document that

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Roadmap proposal, v3

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 9:19 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:41 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal < > chris.bar...@noaa.gov> wrote: > >> > Obviously the string dtype proposal in the roadmap is only a sketch at >> this point :). >> > >> > I do think that options listed curre

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Roadmap proposal, v3

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:41 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal < chris.bar...@noaa.gov> wrote: > > Obviously the string dtype proposal in the roadmap is only a sketch at > this point :). > > > > I do think that options listed currently (encoded strings with > fixed-width storage and variable length

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Roadmap proposal, v3

> Obviously the string dtype proposal in the roadmap is only a sketch at this > point :). > > I do think that options listed currently (encoded strings with fixed-width > storage and variable length strings) cover the breadth of proposals from last > time. We may not want to implement all of the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Roadmap proposal, v3

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 4:02 PM Stefan van der Walt wrote: > Hi Chris, > > On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 08:13:26 -0700, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote: > > For example, I am very wary of putting a non-fixed width encoding (e.g. > > Utf-8) in a fixed width field. > > > > But this PR is not the place to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Roadmap proposal, v3

Hi Chris, On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 08:13:26 -0700, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote: > For example, I am very wary of putting a non-fixed width encoding (e.g. > Utf-8) in a fixed width field. > > But this PR is not the place to discuss that. Since you've followed that discussion closely, can you pus

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Roadmap proposal, v3

Great work, thanks! I see this: “- Fixed width encoded strings (utf8, latin1, ...)” And a bit of discussion in the PR. But I think there are key questions to be addressed in handling strings in numpy. I know we’ve had a lot of discussion about it on this list over the years — but is there a p

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Roadmap proposal, v3

Hey Stefan/Ralf/Stephan, This looks nice, generally what the community agrees on. Great work, and thanks for putting this together. Best regards, Hameer Abbasi Sent from Astro for Mac On 24. Jul 2018 at 21:04, Stefan van der Walt wrote: Hi everyone, Please take a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Roadmap proposal, v3

Stefan and Ralf -- thanks for finishing this up! I'm quite happy with the state of this. On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 1:17 PM Gael Varoquaux < gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org> wrote: > Looks great! Thank you for doing this! > > Gaël > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:04:49PM -0700, Stefan van der Walt wrote

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Roadmap proposal, v3

Looks great! Thank you for doing this! Gaël On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:04:49PM -0700, Stefan van der Walt wrote: > Hi everyone, > Please take a look at the latest roadmap proposal: > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/11611 > This is a living document, so can easily be modified in the future,

[Numpy-discussion] Roadmap proposal, v3

Hi everyone, Please take a look at the latest roadmap proposal: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/11611 This is a living document, so can easily be modified in the future, but we'd like to get in place a document that corresponds fairly closely with current community priorities. Best regards,