On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 17:35 +0100, Matthew Brett wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Marten van Kerkwijk
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Matthew,
>> >
>> > > it seems to me that we
On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 17:35 +0100, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Marten van Kerkwijk
> wrote:
> > Hi Matthew,
> >
> > > it seems to me that we could get 80% of the way to a reassuring
> > > blueprint with a relatively small amount of
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Marten van Kerkwijk <
m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My sentence "adapt the typical academic rule for conflicts of
> interests to PRs, that non-trivial ones cannot be merged by someone
> who has a conflict of interest with the author, i.e., it cannot be a
>
Hi,
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:56 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 13, 2017
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:56 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> As some of
Okay, a few more details :-)
The initial funding here is a grant from the Gordon and Betty Moore
Foundation to UCB with me as PI, in the amount of $645,020. There's
also another thing in the pipeline that might supplement that, but
it'll be
~6 months yet before we know for sure. So keep your
Great news, Nathaniel! It was a huge boost to matplotlib a couple of years
ago when we got an FTE, even if it was just for a few months. While that
effort didn't directly produce any new features, we were able to overhaul
some very old parts of the codebase. Probably why the effort was so
Hi,
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:56 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As some of you know, I've been working for... quite some time now to
>> try to secure funding for NumPy. So
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As some of you know, I've been working for... quite some time now to
>> try to secure funding for NumPy. So I'm
Awesome! This is really great news.
Does this mean is several person-years of funding secured?
-CHB
> On May 13, 2017, at 10:47 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As some of you know, I've been working for... quite some time now to
> try to secure funding for NumPy. So
Hi all,
As some of you know, I've been working for... quite some time now to
try to secure funding for NumPy. So I'm excited that I can now
officially announce that BIDS [1] is planning to hire several folks
specifically to work on NumPy. These will full time positions at UC
Berkeley, postdoc or
11 matches
Mail list logo