On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 8:15 AM Stefan van der Walt
wrote:
> On September 2, 2018 06:16:36 Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>> I'd like to see the NEPs rescued, and the summary moved from the
>> numpy.org repo (maybe into yet another NEP?). It would be best if the
>> original authors do this, but otherwise
Makes sense to me
On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 9:15 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Recently a few people (Tyler, Matti, myself, maybe others?) were discussing
> the history of missing data in the context of custom dtypes. I mentioned
> that there was a good write-up, but couldn't find it at the
On September 2, 2018 06:16:36 Ralf Gommers wrote:
I'd like to see the NEPs rescued, and the summary moved from the numpy.org
repo (maybe into yet another NEP?). It would be best if the original
authors do this, but otherwise I'm happy to do it. Thoughts?
I think this is an excellent suggestio
Hi all,
Recently a few people (Tyler, Matti, myself, maybe others?) were discussing
the history of missing data in the context of custom dtypes. I mentioned
that there was a good write-up, but couldn't find it at the time. I just
stumbled across it, it's hidden in the numpy.org repo:
http://www.nu
