Hi all,
I would like to formally propose accepting NEP 51. Without any concern
voiced, we will consider it accepted within 7 days.
As a reminder, this is to change the representation of NumPy scalars to
be consistent and include the type name.
That means the following representations:
np.fl
Thanks for bringing this up again. The Python method exists and it
seems like relatively basic functionality.
Overall, I am slightly in favor of adding the ufunc. So if nobody
voices an opinion that it doesn't seem a good fit for NumPy, I would be
happy to move forward with it.
- Sebastian
PS
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 08:09:02PM +0100, Sebastian Berg wrote:
> Thanks for bringing this up again. The Python method exists and it
> seems like relatively basic functionality.
>
> Overall, I am slightly in favor of adding the ufunc. So if nobody
> voices an opinion that it doesn't seem a good
Hi. I would like to help contribute with the code. I would like to know where
to get started. There are a couple features in mind that I feel is missing and
would be helpful.
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org
To unsubscri
Thank you for your interest in contributing to NumPy, Kode!
Here is a quick overview of all the ways one can contribute to the project:
https://numpy.org/contribute/
If you’d like to focus on the source code, have a look at the issues that
are up to 12 months old in the issue tracker (
https://gith
