Dear all,
I second Yagiz’ proposal. I do, however, see that we need to ensure code style
(and probably other forms of) consistency before merging these new functions
in. And, particularly important, adherence to the conventions of function and
method names.
Cheers,
Peter
From: Yağız Ölmez
Da
On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 8:08 AM Ralf Gommers wrote:
> This NEP will supersede the following NEPs:
>
> - :ref:`NEP30` (never implemented)
> - :ref:`NEP31` (never implemented)
> - :ref:`NEP37` (never implemented; the ``__array_module__`` idea is
> basically
> the same as ``__array_namespace__``)
>
When dealing with lists that contain duplicate data, np.argsort fails to
return index values that correspond to the actual sorting positions of the
data, as it does when handling arrays without duplicates.
Dear Author:
When I use the np.argsort function on an array without duplicate data, the
ret
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 11:05 PM hao chen
wrote:
> When dealing with lists that contain duplicate data, np.argsort fails to
> return index values that correspond to the actual sorting positions of the
> data, as it does when handling arrays without duplicates.
>
> Dear Author:
>
> When I use the
