Re: [Numpy-discussion] question about standalone small software and teaching

2007-04-04 Thread Giorgio Luciano
Thanks for the reply I will sure try to use it and so some small software. Giorgio ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] About NumPy description

2007-04-04 Thread Francesc Altet
A Dimecres 04 Abril 2007 00:42, Charles R Harris escrigué: > OT, but... > > Francesc, could you say whether tickets 373 and 394, reporting possible > memory leaks, are still valid? 394 was fixed by Travis long time ago (he simply forgot to close the ticket, but now he have done it). Regarding 373

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.0.2 released

2007-04-04 Thread Sven Schreiber
Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On 4/3/07, *Travis Oliphant* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > NumPy 1.0.2 was released yesterday (4-02-07). Get it by following the > And thanks for getting it out. > >From me too! -sven ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list

[Numpy-discussion] Silent install of .exe

2007-04-04 Thread Mark Janikas
Is there a way to silently install the numpy.exe from a Microsoft DOS prompt? Something like: numpy-1.0.2.win32-py2.4.exe -silent Thanks ahead of time... MJ Mark Janikas Product Engineer ESRI, Geoprocessing 380 New York St. Redlands, CA 92373 909-793-2853 (2563) [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [Numpy-discussion] About NumPy description

2007-04-04 Thread Francesc Altet
A Dimecres 04 Abril 2007 04:13, Steven H. Rogers escrigué: > How about: > """ > NumPy extends Python with a multi-dimensional array type (class) and > related mathematical functions. This provides the Python user with > useful abstractions for managing and computing with multi-dimensional > bulk d

[Numpy-discussion] [ANN] PyTables 2.0b2 relased

2007-04-04 Thread Francesc Altet
=== Announcing PyTables 2.0b2 === PyTables is a library for managing hierarchical datasets and designed to efficiently cope with extremely large amounts of data with support for full 64-bit file addressing. PyTables runs on top of the HDF5 library

Re: [Numpy-discussion] question about standalone small software and teaching

2007-04-04 Thread vallis . 35530053
Hello Gael (numpy friends), I'd love to use Traits and TraitsUI. It looks like a very promising approach. But why is it so difficult to install? If I download the source from http://code.enthought.com/traits/, and follow the instructions in enthought.traits-1.1.0/README, and then run the "code sni

Re: [Numpy-discussion] question about standalone small software and teaching

2007-04-04 Thread Robert Kern
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello Gael (numpy friends), > > I'd love to use Traits and TraitsUI. It looks > like a very promising approach. But why is it so difficult to install? If > I download the source from http://code.enthought.com/traits/, and follow the > instructions in enthought.traits-1.1

Re: [Numpy-discussion] question about standalone small software and teaching

2007-04-04 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 04:36:19PM -0500, Robert Kern wrote: > > As you can see, I'm very confused... if only there was a traits Python > > egg... > There are, but only binaries for win32 at the moment. Building from > source on OS X should be straightforward, though. How about linux eggs ? I had

Re: [Numpy-discussion] question about standalone small software and teaching

2007-04-04 Thread vallis . 35530053
--- Discussion of Numerical Python > BTW, I'm using Python 2.4.4 on Macintel, with wxPython-2.8.0. > > We require wxPython 2.6 at the moment. Ah, good to know. This could explain the errors I get when compiling in place. > > If I get the latest SVN of the enthought tool suite, go to enthought/

Re: [Numpy-discussion] question about standalone small software and teaching

2007-04-04 Thread Robert Kern
Gael Varoquaux wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 04:36:19PM -0500, Robert Kern wrote: >>> As you can see, I'm very confused... if only there was a traits Python >>> egg... > >> There are, but only binaries for win32 at the moment. Building from >> source on OS X should be straightforward, though. >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] question about standalone small software and teaching

2007-04-04 Thread Robert Kern
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > --- Discussion of Numerical Python [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: >>> If I get the latest > SVN of the enthought tool suite, go to enthought/src/lib/enthought/traits, > >>> and build with >>> >>> python setup.py build_src build_clib build_ext > --inplace >>> >>> as suggest

Re: [Numpy-discussion] question about standalone small software and teaching

2007-04-04 Thread Sebastian Haase
Is enthought now defaulting to numpy ? -Sebastian On 4/4/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > --- Discussion of Numerical Python > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > >>> If I get the latest > > SVN of the enthought tool suite, go to enthought/src/lib/enthought

Re: [Numpy-discussion] question about standalone small software and teaching

2007-04-04 Thread Sebastian Haase
Hello Gael, Short question regarding your tutorial -- I'm very intrigued by traits and would like to use them too Why do you define e.g. the Point class like this: class Point(object): """ 3D Point objects """ x = 0. y = 0. z = 0. and not like this: class Point(object): "

Re: [Numpy-discussion] question about standalone small software and teaching

2007-04-04 Thread Robert Kern
Sebastian Haase wrote: > Is enthought now defaulting to numpy ? Still set NUMERIX=numpy for now. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." --

Re: [Numpy-discussion] question about standalone small software and teaching

2007-04-04 Thread Robert Kern
Sebastian Haase wrote: > Hello Gael, > > Short question regarding your tutorial -- I'm very intrigued by traits > and would like to use them too > Why do you define e.g. the Point class like this: > class Point(object): > """ 3D Point objects """ > x = 0. > y = 0. > z = 0. >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] nd_image.affine_transform edge effects

2007-04-04 Thread James Turner
> OK, that was a one-line patch. Please test to see if there are any > subtle conditions on the border that I may have missed. I know of one > already, but I'd be glad if you can find any others :) Thanks, Stefan! That looks much better. Today I finally had time to figure out the basics of SV

Re: [Numpy-discussion] nd_image.affine_transform edge effects

2007-04-04 Thread James Turner
> It looks like the last output value is produced by reflecting the > input and then interpolating, but presumably then the first value > should be 3.9, for consistency, not 3.1? Does that make sense? Aargh. I think I see what's happening now. The input is supposed to be interpolated and then r

Re: [Numpy-discussion] question about standalone small software and teaching

2007-04-04 Thread Sebastian Haase
On 4/4/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sebastian Haase wrote: > > Hello Gael, > > > > Short question regarding your tutorial -- I'm very intrigued by traits > > and would like to use them too > > Why do you define e.g. the Point class like this: > > class Point(object): > > ""

Re: [Numpy-discussion] question about standalone small software and teaching

2007-04-04 Thread Robert Kern
Sebastian Haase wrote: > OK, but what is "wrong" with the first way !? I mean, it somehow > seems not like "it's usually done" in Python ? Normally there is > always a __init__(self) that sets up everything referring to self -- > why is this tutorial doing it differently ? Because it makes the

[Numpy-discussion] Big list of Numpy & Scipy users

2007-04-04 Thread Bill Baxter
On 4/4/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bill Baxter wrote: > > Is there any place on the Wiki that lists all the known software that > > uses Numpy in some way? > > >> > It would be nice to start collecting such a list if there isn't one > > already. Screenshots would be nice too. > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] question about standalone small software and teaching

2007-04-04 Thread Bill Baxter
Ok, I got another hopefully easy question: Why this: class Point(object): ... Instead of the style that's used in the Python tutorial in the 'classes' chapter: class Point: ... --bb On 4/5/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sebastian Haase wrote: > > > OK, b

Re: [Numpy-discussion] question about standalone small software and teaching

2007-04-04 Thread Robert Kern
Bill Baxter wrote: > Ok, I got another hopefully easy question: > > Why this: > class Point(object): > ... > > Instead of the style that's used in the Python tutorial in the > 'classes' chapter: > class Point: > ... Because the former make new-style classes and the latt

Re: [Numpy-discussion] basic python questions

2007-04-04 Thread Bill Baxter
On 4/5/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bill Baxter wrote: > > Ok, I got another hopefully easy question: > > > > Why this: > > class Point(object): > > ... > > > > Instead of the style that's used in the Python tutorial in the > > 'classes' chapter: > > class Point: >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] basic python questions

2007-04-04 Thread Robert Kern
Bill Baxter wrote: > On 4/5/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Bill Baxter wrote: >>> Ok, I got another hopefully easy question: >>> >>> Why this: >>> class Point(object): >>> ... >>> >>> Instead of the style that's used in the Python tutorial in the >>> 'classes' chapter:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] basic python questions

2007-04-04 Thread Bill Baxter
On 4/5/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bill Baxter wrote: > > On 4/5/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Bill Baxter wrote: > >>> Ok, I got another hopefully easy question: > >>> > >>> Why this: > >>> class Point(object): > >>> ... > >>> > >>> Instead of the s

Re: [Numpy-discussion] basic python questions

2007-04-04 Thread Eric Firing
Robert Kern wrote: > Bill Baxter wrote: >> On 4/5/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Bill Baxter wrote: Ok, I got another hopefully easy question: Why this: class Point(object): ... Instead of the style that's used in the Python tutorial

Re: [Numpy-discussion] basic python questions

2007-04-04 Thread Alan G Isaac
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007, Eric Firing apparently wrote: > Key point: properties work with new-style classes but fail > silently and mysteriously with classic classes. Or making the same point a little more generally, descriptors only work for new-style classes: http://users.rcn.com/python/download/D

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Big list of Numpy & Scipy users

2007-04-04 Thread Sebastian Haase
Hi, Why do you call it Scipy_Projects if it also lists people/project who use (only) numpy. I wish I could suggest a better name ... I just checked the swig.org web site; the call it just "projects" ( http://www.swig.org/projects.html ) [ Open source projects using SWIG ] so maybe just leaving

Re: [Numpy-discussion] basic python questions

2007-04-04 Thread Sebastian Haase
On 4/4/07, Bill Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/5/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Bill Baxter wrote: > > > Ok, I got another hopefully easy question: > > > > > > Why this: > > > class Point(object): > > > ... > > > > > > Instead of the style that's used in the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Big list of Numpy & Scipy users

2007-04-04 Thread Bill Baxter
On 4/5/07, Sebastian Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > Why do you call it > Scipy_Projects > if it also lists people/project who use (only) numpy. > > I wish I could suggest a better name ... > I just checked the swig.org web site; the call it just > "projects" ( http://www.swig.org/proje

Re: [Numpy-discussion] question about standalone small software and teaching

2007-04-04 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 05:07:38PM -0500, Robert Kern wrote: > Ah, sorry, I missed the bit where you said you only built inside > enthought/traits/. I'd build the whole suite. It'll take a bit, > building the extension modules for Kiva, but nothing too bad. I don't > know why you'd get the error, t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] question about standalone small software and teaching

2007-04-04 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 04:46:59PM -0700, Sebastian Haase wrote: > Why do you define e.g. the Point class like this: > class Point(object): > """ 3D Point objects """ > x = 0. > y = 0. > z = 0. > and not like this: > class Point(object): > """ 3D Point objects """ > def __i