Hi folks,
A number of you expressed interest in attending the PyData workshop
last month and unfortunately we had very tight space restrictions.
But thanks to the team at Marakana, who pitched in and were willing to
film, edit and post videos for many of the talks, you can access them
all here:
h
[ Making a separate thread so the NA one can stay on topic, since I
haven't actually followed the discussion well enough to contribute on
the technical points ]
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> The absurd over-statement is the following:
>
> " I'm afraid I have to disagree
I have never found mailing lists good places for discussion and consensus.
I think the format itself does not lend itself to involvement, carefully
considered (or the ability to change) positions, or voting since all of it
can be so easily lost within all of the quoting, the back and forth, people
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>> Right - but that would be an absurd overstatement of what I said.
>> There's no point in addressing something I didn't say and no sensible
>> person would think. Indeed, it mak
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Right - but that would be an absurd overstatement of what I said.
> There's no point in addressing something I didn't say and no sensible
> person would think. Indeed, it makes the discussion harder.
Well, in that case neither Eric Firing
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>> I'm glad to hear that discussion is happening, but please do have it
>> on list. If it's off list it easy for people to feel they are being
>> bypassed, and that the publi
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> I'm glad to hear that discussion is happening, but please do have it
> on list. If it's off list it easy for people to feel they are being
> bypassed, and that the public discussion is not important.
I'm afraid I have to disagree: you see
On 04/17/2012 08:40 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Matthew Brett
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Travis Oliphant
>>> wrote:
Mark and I will have conversations about N
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>> Mark and I will have conversations about NumPy while he is in Austin.
>>> There are many other activ
Thanks Paul.
I suppose this is now going slightly out of bounds for f2py. What I am
looking for is the fortran kind type for a byte. I thought that this was
int8. I guess the question is how to identify the kind type. Although I
have verified that integer(1) seems to work for me, I would real
Ah, come to think of it, I think that f2py only supports literal kind values.
Maybe that's your problem.
Paul
On 17. apr. 2012, at 07:58, Sameer Grover wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 April 2012 11:02 AM, John Mitchell wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am using f2py to pass a numpy array of type numpy.int8 to fort
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>> Mark and I will have conversations about NumPy while he is in Austin.
>> There are many other active stake-holders whose opinions and views are
>> essential for major cha
Thanks Sameer. I confirmed on my side as well. I will try to understand
the why part now. Much appreciated.
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Sameer Grover
wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 April 2012 11:02 AM, John Mitchell wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using f2py to pass a numpy array of type numpy.int8 to
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> Basically, there are two sets of changes as far as I understand right now:
>
> 1) ufunc infrastructure understands masked arrays
> 2) ndarray grew attributes to represent masked arrays
>
> I am proposing that we keep 1) but ch
14 matches
Mail list logo
