On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 7:30 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
> On 26 June 2013 09:05, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> wrote:
> > On 06/25/2013 04:21 PM, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I wasn't able to attend this year Scipy Conference. My tutorial proposal
> >> was rejected and other deadline i
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 1:56 PM, wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Sebastian Berg
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 12:52 -0400, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Sebastian Berg
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 11:30 -0400, josef.p...@gmail.com wrot
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 12:52 -0400, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Sebastian Berg
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 11:30 -0400, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >> Is there a change in the behavior of bool
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 12:52 -0400, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Sebastian Berg
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 11:30 -0400, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> Is there a change in the behavior of boolean slicing in current master?
> >>
> >
> > Yes, but I think t
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 11:30 -0400, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Is there a change in the behavior of boolean slicing in current master?
>>
>
> Yes, but I think this is probably a bug in statsmodel. I would expect
> you should be using "..
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 11:30 -0400, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
> Is there a change in the behavior of boolean slicing in current master?
>
Yes, but I think this is probably a bug in statsmodel. I would expect
you should be using "..." and not ":" here, because ":" requires the
dimension to actual
Is there a change in the behavior of boolean slicing in current master?
If not I have to find another candidate in numpy master.
(py27d) E:\Josef\testing\tox\py27d\Scripts>python
Python 2.7.1 (r271:86832, Nov 27 2010, 18:30:46) [MSC v.1500 32 bit
(Intel)] on win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credi
On 19 June 2013 01:43, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Julian Taylor
> wrote:
>>
>> On 17.06.2013 17:11, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I saw that recently Julian Taylor is doing many low level optimization
>> > like using SSE instruction. I think
On 26 June 2013 09:05, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> On 06/25/2013 04:21 PM, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wasn't able to attend this year Scipy Conference. My tutorial proposal
>> was rejected and other deadline intefered with this conference date.
>>
>> Will the presentation be recor
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Todd wrote:
> But wouldn't there be a benefit from integrating ndarrays directly into
> the grammar like lists, tuples, and dictionaries?
>
That was never on the table. The benefit of ndarray literals is relatively
tiny and does not justify a change to the gramm
But wouldn't there be a benefit from integrating ndarrays directly into the
grammar like lists, tuples, and dictionaries?
On Jun 18, 2013 11:41 AM, "Robert Kern" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Todd wrote:
> > I see that the plan to merge old Numeric into the python standard
library
On 06/25/2013 04:21 PM, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wasn't able to attend this year Scipy Conference. My tutorial proposal
> was rejected and other deadline intefered with this conference date.
>
> Will the presentation be recorded? If not, can you make the slide available?
>
> What is your
12 matches
Mail list logo
