On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Sturla Molden sturla.mol...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, but that would require rewriting much of numpy.random to allow
replacing the core generator. This would work out-of-box because it's
just manipulating the state of the
slightly OT; but fwiw, its all ill-thought out nonsense from the start
anyway.
ALL numbers satisfy the predicate 0*x=0. what the IEEE calls 'not a
number' would be more accurately called 'not a specific number', or 'a
number'. whats a logical negation among computer scientists?
On Fri, Oct 3,
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 4:29 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:20 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
Out[1] has an integer divided by an integer, and you can't represent
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
The seterr warning system makes a lot of sense for IEEE754 floats,
which are specifically designed so that 0/0 has a unique well-defined
answer. For ints though this seems really broken to me. 0 / 0 = 0 is
just the wrong
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Stephan Hoyer sho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
The seterr warning system makes a lot of sense for IEEE754 floats,
which are specifically designed so that 0/0 has a unique well-defined
answer. For
It does, but it is not portable. That's why I was hoping NumPy might think
about supporting more rounding algorithms.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:00 PM, John Zwinck jzwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 Oct 2014 07:09, T J tjhn...@gmail.com wrote:
Any bites on this?
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:23
Hi,
When you run f2py without -c option, the wrapper source files are generated
without compiling them.
With these source files and fortranobject.c, you can build the extension
module with your specific compiler options using the compiler framework of
your choice.
I am not familiar with Visual
On 10/03/2014 06:13 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
Plus the g*dawful warning default to only warn once. That has always bothered
me, it just seems useless.
If you use a custom warning, there's no reason why you couldn't set a filter
that shows it every time by default.
Georg
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:13 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Plus the g*dawful warning default to only warn once. That has always
bothered me, it just seems useless.
I believe the idea is
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:13 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Plus the g*dawful warning default to only warn once.
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:13 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Plus the g*dawful warning default to only warn once.
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:13 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Charles R Harris
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 4:29 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:20 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 4:29 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:20 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 4:29 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On
15 matches
Mail list logo
