Sorry to keep harping on this, but for history's sake, I was one of the
folks that got 'U' introduced in the first place. I was dealing with a
nightmare of unix, mac and dos test files, 'U' was a godsend.
On 4/5/11 4:51 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
The difference between 'rt' and 'U' is (this is
On 4/5/11 10:33 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
Did you mean to send this just to me? It seems like the whole is
generally interesting and helpful, at least to me...
I did mean to send to the list -- I've done that now.
Well, the current code doesn't split on \r in py3k, admittedly that
must be a
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On 4/4/11 9:03 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Charles R Harris
File /sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/lib/_datasource.py,
line 477, in open
return
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.govwrote:
On 4/4/11 9:03 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Charles R Harris
File
SUSE 11.3, python 2.7, gcc 4.3.4, gfortran from gcc 4.6.0, I get two failures on
commit 1439a8ddcb2eda20fa102aa44e846783f29c0af3 (head of 1.6.x
maintenance branch).
--George.
==
FAIL: Test basic arithmetic function errors
On 4/4/11 10:35 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
IIUC, Ub is undefined -- U means universal newlines, which makes no
sense when used with b for binary. I looked at the code a ways back,
and I can't remember the resolution order, but there isn't any checking
for incompatible flags.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Christopher Barker
chris.bar...@noaa.govwrote:
On 4/4/11 10:35 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
IIUC, Ub is undefined -- U means universal newlines, which makes
no
sense when used with b for binary. I looked at the code a ways
back,
and I can't
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Christopher Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov
wrote:
On 4/4/11 10:35 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
IIUC, Ub is undefined -- U means universal newlines, which makes
no
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:45 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Christopher Barker
chris.bar...@noaa.gov
wrote:
On 4/4/11 10:35 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
IIUC,
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:45 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Christopher Barker
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Christopher Barker
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On 4/4/11 10:35 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
IIUC, Ub is undefined -- U means universal newlines, which makes no
sense when used with b for binary. I looked at the code a ways back,
and I can't
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Christopher Barker
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On 4/4/11 10:35 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
IIUC, Ub is undefined -- U means universal newlines, which makes no
sense when
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
snip
A few numpy tests fail on win-amd64:
snip
==
FAIL: test_iterator.test_iter_broadcasting_errors
On 4/5/11 3:36 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I disagree that U makes no sense for binary file reading.
I wasn't saying that it made no sense to have a U mode for binary file
reading, what I meant is that by the python2 definition, it made no
sense. In Python 2, the ONLY difference between
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Christopher Barker
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On 4/5/11 3:36 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I disagree that U makes no sense for binary file reading.
I wasn't saying that it made no sense to have a U mode for binary file
reading, what I meant is that by
On 4/5/2011 4:05 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu
mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
snip
A few numpy tests fail on win-amd64:
snip
==
FAIL:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 4/5/2011 4:05 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu
mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
snip
A few numpy tests fail on win-amd64:
snip
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 4/5/2011 4:05 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu
mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
snip
A few numpy tests fail on win-amd64:
snip
On 4/5/2011 6:46 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu
mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 4/5/2011 4:05 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu
mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 4/5/2011 6:46 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu
mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 4/5/2011 4:05 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at
On 4/5/2011 7:44 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu
mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 4/5/2011 6:46 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu
mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu
Hi,
I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy
1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this
release, the beta testing phase will last at least one month. Please
test this beta and report any problems on the Numpy mailing list.
Many bug fixes went in
Hi all,
On 4 Apr 2011, at 22:04, Ralf Gommers wrote:
I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy
1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this
release, the beta testing phase will last at least one month. Please
test this beta and report any
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Derek Homeier
de...@astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de wrote:
Hi all,
On 4 Apr 2011, at 22:04, Ralf Gommers wrote:
I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy
1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this
release,
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Derek Homeier
de...@astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de wrote:
Hi all,
On 4 Apr 2011, at 22:04, Ralf Gommers wrote:
I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta
On 4/4/2011 1:04 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
Hi,
I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy
1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this
release, the beta testing phase will last at least one month. Please
test this beta and report any problems on
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 4/4/2011 1:04 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
Hi,
I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy
1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this
release, the beta testing phase will
On 4/4/11 9:03 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Charles R Harris
File /sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/lib/_datasource.py,
line 477, in open
return _file_openers[ext](found, mode=mode)
IOError: invalid mode: Ub
Guess that wasn't tested before
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On 4/4/11 9:03 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Charles R Harris
File /sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/lib/_datasource.py,
line 477, in open
return
29 matches
Mail list logo
