On 03/17/2011 03:23 PM, Yung-Yu Chen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 17:46, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
mailto:d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no>> wrote:
On 03/16/2011 10:14 PM, william ratcliff wrote:
> Related to this, what is the status of fwrap? Can it be used with
> fortran 95/2003 language
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 17:46, Dag Sverre Seljebotn <
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no> wrote:
> On 03/16/2011 10:14 PM, william ratcliff wrote:
> > Related to this, what is the status of fwrap? Can it be used with
> > fortran 95/2003 language features? There is a rather large code
> > crystallographi
On 03/16/2011 10:14 PM, william ratcliff wrote:
> Related to this, what is the status of fwrap? Can it be used with
> fortran 95/2003 language features? There is a rather large code
> crystallographic codebase (fullprof) that is written in fortran 77
> that the author has been porting to fortr
Related to this, what is the status of fwrap? Can it be used with fortran
95/2003 language features? There is a rather large code crystallographic
codebase (fullprof) that is written in fortran 77 that the author has been
porting to fortran 95/2003 and actually using modules for. I'd like to
wri
My two pence worth, my experience is across python, C++ and fortran (and a few
other languages) and the posts here are interesting and relevant. I think that
the true value of any of these languages is knowing any of them well, if you
happen to work with other folks who share the same skills mo
