[Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

2016-02-08 Thread Evgeni Burovski
-- Forwarded message -- From: Evgeni Burovski Date: Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:56 AM Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test To: Discussion of Numerical Python On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > As some of you may ha

[Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

2016-02-09 Thread Freddy Rietdijk
On Nix we also had trouble with OpenBLAS 0.2.15. Version 0.2.14 did not cause any segmentation faults so we reverted to that version. https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/5620 (hopefully this time the e-mail gets through) On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Daπid wrote: > On 8 February 2016 at 20

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

2016-02-08 Thread Matthew Brett
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:57 AM, Evgeni Burovski wrote: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Evgeni Burovski > Date: Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:56 AM > Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test > To: Discussion of Numerical Python > > > On Sat, Feb 6,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

2016-02-08 Thread Matthew Brett
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:57 AM, Evgeni Burovski > wrote: >> -- Forwarded message -- >> From: Evgeni Burovski >> Date: Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:56 AM >> Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

2016-02-08 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: [...] > I can't replicate the segfault with manylinux wheels and scipy. On > the other hand, I get a new test error for numpy from manylinux, scipy > from manylinux, like this: > > $ python -c 'import scipy.linalg; scipy.linalg.test()' > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

2016-02-08 Thread Matthew Brett
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > [...] >> I can't replicate the segfault with manylinux wheels and scipy. On >> the other hand, I get a new test error for numpy from manylinux, scipy >> from manylinux, like this: >> >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

2016-02-08 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Matthew Brett >> wrote: >> [...] >>> I can't replicate the segfault with manylinux wheels and scipy. On >>> the other hand, I get a new test error fo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

2016-02-08 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Matthew Brett >>> wrote: >>> [...] I can't replicate the segfault with manylinux whee

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

2016-02-09 Thread Evgeni Burovski
>>> == >>> ERROR: test_multiarray.TestNewBufferProtocol.test_relaxed_strides >>> -- >>> Traceback (most recent call last): >>> File >>> "/home/br/virtualenvs/ma

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

2016-02-09 Thread Julian Taylor
On 09.02.2016 04:59, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Matthew Brett >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: [...]

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

2016-02-09 Thread Matthew Brett
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Julian Taylor wrote: > On 09.02.2016 04:59, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Matthew Brett >>> wrote: On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Mon, F

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

2016-02-09 Thread Matthew Brett
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Matthew Brett >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

2016-02-09 Thread Julian Taylor
On 09.02.2016 20:52, Matthew Brett wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Matthew Brett >>> wrote: On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Mon, Fe

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

2016-02-09 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Julian Taylor wrote: > On 09.02.2016 04:59, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Matthew Brett >>> wrote: On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Mon, F

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

2016-02-09 Thread Julian Taylor
On 09.02.2016 21:01, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Julian Taylor > wrote: >> On 09.02.2016 04:59, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 201

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

2016-02-17 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Freddy Rietdijk wrote: > On Nix we also had trouble with OpenBLAS 0.2.15. Version 0.2.14 did not > cause any segmentation faults so we reverted to that version. > https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/5620 > > (hopefully this time the e-mail gets through) In