Christopher Barker wrote:
> Andrea Gavana wrote:
>
>> I have tried the solutions proposed in the previous thread and it
>> looks like Chris' one is the fastest for my purposes.
>>
>
> whoo hoo! What do I win? ;-)
>
>
>> Splitting the reading process between 4 processes will require t
Andrea Gavana wrote:
> I have tried the solutions proposed in the previous thread and it
> looks like Chris' one is the fastest for my purposes.
whoo hoo! What do I win? ;-)
> Splitting the reading process between 4 processes will require the
> exchange of 5-20 MB from the child processes to
Hi All,
I have tried the solutions proposed in the previous thread and it
looks like Chris' one is the fastest for my purposes. Now, I have a
question which is probably more conceptual than
implementation-related.
I started this little thread as my task is to read medium to
(relatively) big u
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Neil Crighton wrote:
> Andrea Gavana gmail.com> writes:
>
>> this should be a very easy question but I am trying to make a
>> script run as fast as possible, so please bear with me if the solution
>> is easy and I just overlooked it.
>
> That's weird, I was tr
Andrea Gavana gmail.com> writes:
> this should be a very easy question but I am trying to make a
> script run as fast as possible, so please bear with me if the solution
> is easy and I just overlooked it.
That's weird, I was trying to solve exactly the same problem a couple of weeks
ago for
Hi All,
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:28 PM, David Warde-Farley wrote:
> On 22-May-09, at 6:13 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
>
>> that's why I put a sys.maxint at the end of the series...
>
> Oops! I foolishly assumed the sequence was unaltered. That makes a lot
> more sense.
Thank you guys for your
On 22-May-09, at 6:13 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
> that's why I put a sys.maxint at the end of the series...
Oops! I foolishly assumed the sequence was unaltered. That makes a lot
more sense.
David
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussio
On May 22, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
> Pierre GM wrote:
>> scikits.hydroclimpy.core.tools (hydroclimpy.sourceforge.net).
>
> whoa! Why didn't I ever see that before. Here I am , witting a whole
> bunch of my own code to deal with time series of meteorological
> data
> argg
Pierre GM wrote:
> scikits.hydroclimpy.core.tools (hydroclimpy.sourceforge.net).
whoa! Why didn't I ever see that before. Here I am , witting a whole
bunch of my own code to deal with time series of meteorological data
argg!
Now I need to go dig into that more.
-Chris
--
Christopher B
David Warde-Farley wrote:
> I don't think this is very general:
>
> In [53]: indices
> Out[53]:
> array([ -3, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
> 9, 255, 256, 257, 258, 10001, 10002, 10003, 10004])
>
> In [54]: breaks = diff(indices) != 1
>
> In [55]:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 3:59 PM, David Warde-Farley wrote:
> On 22-May-09, at 1:03 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
>
>> In [104]: zip(indices[np.r_[True, breaks[:-1]]], indices[breaks])
>
>
>
> I don't think this is very general:
>
> In [53]: indices
> Out[53]:
> array([ -3, 1, 2, 3,
On May 22, 2009, at 12:31 PM, Andrea Gavana wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>this should be a very easy question but I am trying to make a
> script run as fast as possible, so please bear with me if the solution
> is easy and I just overlooked it.
>
> I have a list of integers, like this one:
>
> indices
On 22-May-09, at 1:03 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
> In [104]: zip(indices[np.r_[True, breaks[:-1]]], indices[breaks])
I don't think this is very general:
In [53]: indices
Out[53]:
array([ -3, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
9, 255, 256, 257, 258,
Andrea Gavana wrote:
> I have a list of integers, like this one:
>
> indices = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,255,256,257,258,10001,10002,10003,10004]
>
>>From this list, I would like to find out which values are consecutive
> and store them in another list of tuples (begin_consecutive,
> end_consecutive) or
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Andrea Gavana wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> this should be a very easy question but I am trying to make a
> script run as fast as possible, so please bear with me if the solution
> is easy and I just overlooked it.
>
> I have a list of integers, like this one:
>
> indic
Hi All,
this should be a very easy question but I am trying to make a
script run as fast as possible, so please bear with me if the solution
is easy and I just overlooked it.
I have a list of integers, like this one:
indices = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,255,256,257,258,10001,10002,10003,10004]
>Fro
16 matches
Mail list logo
