Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.8.0rc2 release

2013-10-25 Thread Andrew Straw
Yeah, sorry for the confusion. I thought my email didn't go through. I created a bug report on github instead. Now I find the email was indeed sent. Sorry about that. Looking at the github activity (see https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/3977 ), I think a fix is almost at hand thanks to Julian T

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.8.0rc2 release

2013-10-25 Thread Nathaniel Smith
It's py3 only, see the discussion in #3977. On 25 Oct 2013 17:45, "Charles R Harris" wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Andrew Straw > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I found an unexpected difference from numpy 1.7.1 and 1.8.0rc2 with >> Python 3.3.2 on Ubuntu 12.04 (amd64). Here is the test

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.8.0rc2 release

2013-10-25 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Andrew Straw wrote: > Hi, > > I found an unexpected difference from numpy 1.7.1 and 1.8.0rc2 with Python > 3.3.2 on Ubuntu 12.04 (amd64). Here is the test program: > > import numpy as np > print(np.__version__) > K = np.array([[ 0., 0., 0.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.8.0rc2 release

2013-10-25 Thread alex
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Andrew Straw wrote: > > Hi, > > I found an unexpected difference from numpy 1.7.1 and 1.8.0rc2 with Python 3.3.2 on Ubuntu 12.04 (amd64). Here is the test program: > > import numpy as np > print(np.__version__) > K = np.array([[ 0., 0., 0.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.8.0rc2 release

2013-10-25 Thread Andrew Straw
Hi, I found an unexpected difference from numpy 1.7.1 and 1.8.0rc2 with Python 3.3.2 on Ubuntu 12.04 (amd64). Here is the test program: import numpy as np print(np.__version__) K = np.array([[ 0., 0., 0., 0.], [-0., 0., 0.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.8.0rc2 release

2013-10-16 Thread Piet van Oostrum
Charles R Harris writes: > Hi All, > > NumPy 1.8.0rc2 is up now on sourceforge. Binary builds are included, except > for Python 3.3 on > windows. Many thanks to Ralf for the binaries and to those who found and > fixed the bugs in rc1. > Please test this thoroughly, especially if you have access

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.8.0rc2 release

2013-10-16 Thread Charles R Harris
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi David, > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:46 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: > >> It looks better than rc1, thanks for the great work. I have only tested >> on rh5 for now, but building the following against numpy 1.7.1 and running >> agains

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.8.0rc2 release

2013-10-15 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi David, On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:46 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: > It looks better than rc1, thanks for the great work. I have only tested on > rh5 for now, but building the following against numpy 1.7.1 and running > against 1.8.0 rc2 only give a few failures for the full list of packages >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.8.0rc2 release

2013-10-15 Thread David Cournapeau
It looks better than rc1, thanks for the great work. I have only tested on rh5 for now, but building the following against numpy 1.7.1 and running against 1.8.0 rc2 only give a few failures for the full list of packages supported by Enthought. Bottleneck / larry are caused by numpy, the sklearn may

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.8.0rc2 release

2013-10-14 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, NumPy 1.8.0rc2 is up now on sourceforge. Binary builds are included, except for Python 3.3 on windows. Many thanks to Ralf for the binaries and to those who found and fixed the bugs in rc1. Please test this thoroughly, especially