On Di, 2015-03-10 at 11:22 -0700, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2015 11:15 AM, "Paul Hobson" wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Paul Hobson
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I feel your pain. Making it worse,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2015 11:15 AM, "Paul Hobson" wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Paul Hobson wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I feel
On 09/03/15 21:34, Paul Hobson wrote:
> I feel your pain. Making it worse, numpy.random.lognormal takes "mean"
> and "sigma" as input. If there's ever a backwards incompatible release,
> I hope these things will be cleared up.
The question is how...
The fix is obvious, but the consequences are un
On Mar 10, 2015 11:15 AM, "Paul Hobson" wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Charles R Harris <
charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Paul Hobson wrote:
>>>
>>> I feel your pain. Making it worse, numpy.random.lognormal takes "mean"
and "sigma" as in
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Paul Hobson wrote:
>
>> I feel your pain. Making it worse, numpy.random.lognormal takes "mean"
>> and "sigma" as input. If there's ever a backwards incompatible release, I
>> hope these things will be c
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Paul Hobson wrote:
> I feel your pain. Making it worse, numpy.random.lognormal takes "mean" and
> "sigma" as input. If there's ever a backwards incompatible release, I hope
> these things will be cleared up.
>
There is a numpy 2.0 milestone ;)
Chuck
___
I feel your pain. Making it worse, numpy.random.lognormal takes "mean" and
"sigma" as input. If there's ever a backwards incompatible release, I hope
these things will be cleared up.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Daniel Sank wrote:
> Sturia,
>
> > Change the name of keyword arguments?
> > Th
Sturia,
> Change the name of keyword arguments?
> This would be evil.
Yes, I see this now. It is really a shame these were defined as keyword
arguments. I've shown the docstring to a few people and so far they all
agree that it is unnecessarily convoluted.
Daniel Sank wrote:
> It seems unnecessarily convoluted to name the input arguments "loc" and
> "scale", then immediately define them as the "mean" and "standard
> deviation" in the Parameters section, and then again rename them as "mu"
> and "sigma" in the written formula. I propose to simply ch
Dear numpy users,
I would like to clarify the docstring for numpy.random.normal. I submitted
a patch but it was rejected because it breaks the tests. Unfortunately, the
development workflow page does not explain how to run the tests (in fact it
doesn't mention them at all). I am therefore writing
10 matches
Mail list logo
