On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Sat, 24 Jul 2010 18:22:33 +0800, Ralf Gommers wrote:
There is a bug report asking for the example files under doc/cython,
doc/swig etc. to be
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Sat, 24 Jul 2010 18:22:33 +0800, Ralf Gommers wrote:
There is a bug report asking for the example files under doc/cython,
doc/swig etc. to be included in the released binaries. This thread,
On Jul 31, 2010, at 12:32 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
How about removing the swig html and pdf docs, and then including the
swig/pyrex/cython dirs as-is? In setup.py:
Note that the html and pdf documents are created from the txt file using the
docutils utilities rts2html.py and rst2latex.py.
**
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Bill Spotz wfsp...@sandia.gov wrote:
On Jul 31, 2010, at 12:32 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
How about removing the swig html and pdf docs, and then including the
swig/pyrex/cython dirs as-is? In setup.py:
Note that the html and pdf documents are created from the
Hi all,
There is a bug report asking for the example files under doc/cython,
doc/swig etc. to be included in the released binaries. This thread,
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/26913/focus=26917,
seems to indicate the docs should still be integrated in the main
Sat, 24 Jul 2010 18:22:33 +0800, Ralf Gommers wrote:
There is a bug report asking for the example files under doc/cython,
doc/swig etc. to be included in the released binaries. This thread,
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/26913/
focus=26917,
seems to indicate the docs
