Hello Andy,
I'm not an expert on f2py, but I've used it in a few cases. I can
recreate a NotImplementedError by copying your commands. The problem
is that you are using -l (lower case L), which I think is supposed to
specify the library name, not a path. The NotImplementedError is not
really what
Hello all,
I have been trying to compile a relatively simple pair of Fortran files,
one referencing a subroutine from another file (mainmodule.f90 references
othermodule.f90). I have been able to compile them using a Fortran
compiler, but receive a NotImplementedError when using f2py.
Steps I us
To: numpy-discussion@scipy.org
Subject: [Numpy-discussion] F2PY subroutine referenced in another file
Message-ID: <1468090643073-43261.p...@n7.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hello everyone,
I am relatively new to f2py and have been trying to create a module of a
main fort
Hello everyone,
I am relatively new to f2py and have been trying to create a module of a
main fortran file that references a subroutine in another fortran file. I
have been doing:
>f2py -c -m mainmodule mainmodule.f90 othermodule.f90
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Andy
--
Vi
So on Linux too, there is "ABI" suffix too, for generated module...
I misunderstood. I was renaming generated module to "fib3.pyd" to be able
to do "import fib3", but now I see it's not necessary - it's importable the
same regardless the name of generated module :)
Thanks
___
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:18 PM, klo uo wrote:
> Hi, I'm following this guide:
> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-dev/f2py/getting-started.html#the-quick-and-smart-way
>
> I'm on Windows with gfortran and VS2015. When I run:
>
> f2py -c -m fib3 fib3.f
>
> as output I dont get "fib3.pyd", but "f
Hi, I'm following this guide:
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-dev/f2py/getting-started.html#the-quick-and-smart-way
I'm on Windows with gfortran and VS2015. When I run:
f2py -c -m fib3 fib3.f
as output I dont get "fib3.pyd", but "fib3.cp35-win_amd64.pyd".
Does anyone know how to get correct
Using order='F' solved the problem.
Thanks for reply.
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Yes, f2py is probably copying the arrays; you can check this by appending
-DF2PY_REPORT_ON_ARRAY_COPY=1 to your call to f2py.
I normally prefer to keep the numpy arrays C-order (most efficient for
numpy) and simply pass the array transpose to the f2py-ized fortran routine.
This means that the for
On So, 2016-04-10 at 12:04 +0200, Vasco Gervasi wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am trying to write some code to do calculation onto an array: for
> each row I need to do some computation and have a number as return.
> To speed up the process I wrote a fortran subroutine that is called
> from python [using f2p
Hi all,
I am trying to write some code to do calculation onto an array: for each
row I need to do some computation and have a number as return.
To speed up the process I wrote a fortran subroutine that is called from
python [using f2py] for each row of the array, so the input of this
subroutine is
Thanks a lot for providing the example Sturla, that is exactly what we are
looking for!
On 4 December 2015 at 11:34, Sturla Molden wrote:
> On 03/12/15 22:07, David Verelst wrote:
>
> Can this workflow be incorporated into |setuptools|/|numpy.distutils|?
>> Something along the lines as:
>>
>
> T
On 03/12/15 22:07, David Verelst wrote:
Can this workflow be incorporated into |setuptools|/|numpy.distutils|?
Something along the lines as:
Take a look at what SciPy does.
https://github.com/scipy/scipy/blob/81c096001974f0b5efe29ec83b54f725cc681540/scipy/fftpack/setup.py
Multiple Fortran fi
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:07 PM David Verelst
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For the wafo [1] package we are trying to include the extension
> compilation process in setup.py [2] by using setuptools and
> numpy.distutils [3]. Some of the extensions have one Fortran interface
> source file, but it depends on sev
Hi,
For the wafo [1] package we are trying to include the extension compilation
process in setup.py [2] by using setuptools and numpy.distutils [3]. Some
of the extensions have one Fortran interface source file, but it depends on
several other Fortran sources (modules). The manual compilation proc
Hi Casey,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Casey Deen wrote:
> Hi Pearu-
>
>Thanks so much! This works! Can you point me to a reference for the
> format of the .pyf files? My ~day of searching found a few pages on the
> scipy website, but nothing which went into this amount of detail.
>
Hi Pearu-
Thanks so much! This works! Can you point me to a reference for the
format of the .pyf files? My ~day of searching found a few pages on the
scipy website, but nothing which went into this amount of detail.
I also asked Stackoverflow, and unless you object, I'd like to add your
exp
Hi Casey,
What you observe, is not a f2py bug. When f2py sees a code like
subroutine foo
call bar
end subroutine foo
then it will not make an attempt to analyze bar because of implicit
assumption that all statements that has no references to foo arguments are
irrelevant for wrapper function ge
Hi all-
I've run into what I think might be a bug in f2py and callbacks to
python. Or, maybe I'm not using things correctly. I have created a
very minimal example which illustrates my problem at:
https://github.com/soylentdeen/fluffy-kumquat
The issue seems to affect call backs with variabl
Hello,
the project is already successfully completed, but I thought for the
completeness (and documentation) give myself an answer on what I did wrong and
what the correct solution was.
I. I didn’t realise that parameter ordering was crucial. Somehow I just had
forgotten this knowledge, but not
Dear Pearu Peterson,
Thank you for your reply!
I did as you said, and I got the module mulib.so successfully, but I got
another problem when I try to import this module in Python.
Here are the messeage I got in Python:
Enthought Canopy Python 2.7.6 | 64-bit | (default, Sep 15 2014, 17:36:10)
[G
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 7:23 PM, 石头 wrote:
> Hi,everybody,
> I'm new to f2py, and I got some trouble when wrapped some fortran files
> to Python.
> I have download a Fortran library (
> https://github.com/brianlockwood/ForK), I want to compile these files
> into a library and call the lib
Hi,everybody,
I'm new to f2py, and I got some trouble when wrapped some fortran files to
Python.
I have download a Fortran library (https://github.com/brianlockwood/ForK), I
want to compile these files into a library and call the library by other
Fortran file wrote by myself.
Here are my ques
Hi
I am helping out with a Python and Fortran project. Let me give you some
background:
* Fortran source:
C Bergstrom FCC
C User subroutine VUMAT
subroutine VUMAT(
C Read only -
* nblock, ndir, nshr, nstatev, nprops,
* stepTime, dt,
* props,
* density, st
On 1/26/15, Yuxiang Wang wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Sorry about being new to both Fortran 90 and f2py.
>
> I have a module in fortran, written as follows, with a module-scope variable
> dp:
>
>
> ! testf2py.f90
> module testf2py
> implicit none
> privat
Sorry that I forgot to report the environment -
Windows 64 bit, Python 3.4 64 bit. Numpy version is 1.9.1, and I
commented the "raise NotImplementedError("Only MS compiler supported
with gfortran on win64")" in the gnu.py, as instructed on this link:
http://scientificcomputingco.blogspot.com.au/20
Dear all,
Sorry about being new to both Fortran 90 and f2py.
I have a module in fortran, written as follows, with a module-scope variable dp:
! testf2py.f90
module testf2py
implicit none
private
public dp, i1
integer, parameter :: dp=kind(
Hello !
And thx for answering ! Meanwhile, I founded a solution for my problem : I
hacked some lines setting the compiler options in the f2py Python files,
which enables the generation of pdb files for debugging.
In msvc9compiler.py, line 432
self.ldflags_shared = ['/DLL', '/nologo', '/INCREMENTAL
Hi,
When you run f2py without -c option, the wrapper source files are generated
without compiling them.
With these source files and fortranobject.c, you can build the extension
module with your specific compiler options using the compiler framework of
your choice.
I am not familiar with Visual Stu
Hello to all.
I'm aiming to wrap a Fortran program into Python. I started to work with
f2py, and am trying to setup a debug mode where I could reach
breakpoints in Fortran module launched by Python. I've been looking in
the existing post, but not seeing things like that.
I'm used to work with v
Hi all
Given the following pseudo code:
==
SUBROUTINE READ_B( FILENAME, ix,iy,iz,nx, OUT_ARRAY, out_cat)
IMPLICIT NONE
INTEGER*4, INTENT(IN) :: IX, iy, iz, nx
REAL*4,INTENT(OUT) :: OUT_ARRAY(nx,IX, iy, iz)
CHARACTER, dimension(nx,40),intent(out) ::OUT_CAT
CHARACTER(LEN=
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Alex Goodman
wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> That did the trick, thanks!
>
> Alex
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:50 PM, David Cournapeau
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Alex Goodman <
>> alex.
Hi Robert,
That did the trick, thanks!
Alex
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:50 PM, David Cournapeau
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Alex Goodman <
> alex.good...@colostate.edu>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have used
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:50 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Alex Goodman
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have used f2py in the past on a Linux machine with virtually no issues.
>> However on my Mac, I get the following error when importing an f2py
>> generated ext
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Alex Goodman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have used f2py in the past on a Linux machine with virtually no issues.
> However on my Mac, I get the following error when importing an f2py
> generated extension:
>
> Fatal Python error: PyThreadState_Get: no current thread
> A
Hi all,
I have used f2py in the past on a Linux machine with virtually no issues.
However on my Mac, I get the following error when importing an f2py
generated extension:
Fatal Python error: PyThreadState_Get: no current thread
Abort trap: 6
After doing some research I found out that the extensi
Hi,
The issue with wrapping Fortran codes that contain STOP statements has been
raised several times in past with no good working solution proposed.
Recently the issue was raised again in f2py issues. Since the user was
filling to test out few ideas with positive results, I decided to describe
th
Hi Scott, thanks for your help.
On 12 July 2013 10:02, Scott Sinclair wrote:
>
> Something like the following should work... [...]
>
Your suggestion works like what I already had. The issue is that the .so
created by the Extension is copied to copying
/lib/python2.7/site-packages/
and not to
/lib
On 10 July 2013 17:50, Jose Gomez-Dans wrote:
> Hi,
> I am building a package that exposes some Fortran libraries through f2py.
> The packages directory looks like this:
> setup.py
> my_pack/
> |
> |-->__init__.py
> |--> some.pyf
> |---> code.f90
>
> I thoughat that
Hi,
I am building a package that exposes some Fortran libraries through f2py.
The packages directory looks like this:
setup.py
my_pack/
|
|-->__init__.py
|--> some.pyf
|---> code.f90
I thoughat that once installed, I'd get the .so and __init__.py in the same
directo
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:15 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 5:05 PM, sunghyun Kim
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I'm trying to use fortran wrapper f2py with intel's mkl
>>
>> following is my command
>>
>> LIB='-L/opt/intel/Compiler/11.1/064/mkl/lib/em64t/ -lguide -lpthread
>> -
Hi all,
I assume that this question is addressed somewhere, but I have spent an
inordinate amount of time looking around for the answer including
digging into the source code a bit. I have tried to put the basic
problem in the first paragraph. The rest of the email shows a basic
example of
Hi Jon,
I have personally never used f2py to link to library code, but according to
the documentation:
http://cens.ioc.ee/projects/f2py2e/usersguide/index.html#command-f2py
if you are building a module (that is, invoking f2py -c), then you can
either include the path to the .a file directly at t
Hi all,
I have recently started using f2py to access some legacy fortran code
and it's mostly worked better than I expected. It handles common
blocks, block data, etc. with no problems. I did need to define the
type of all the arguments in subroutine and function calls, but not in
the body of th
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Paul Anton Letnes
wrote:
>
> On 4. juli 2012, at 02:23, Sturla Molden wrote:
>
>> Den 03.07.2012 20:38, skrev Casey W. Stark:
>>>
>>> Sturla, this is valid Fortran, but I agree it might just be a bad
>>> idea. The Fortran 90/95 Explained book mentions this in the
>>
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:
> Den 04.07.2012 01:59, skrev Sturla Molden:
>> But neither was the case here. The allocatable was a dummy variable in
>> a subroutine's interface, declared with intent(out). That is an error
>> the compiler should trap, because it is doomed to
Hi all.
Thanks for the help again. I ended up going with running it twice -- once
for the final number of particles and second for the positions.
Sturla, given that this functionality is so standard dependent, I decided
to ditch it. It works with my gfortran, but who knows with other machines
and
On 4. juli 2012, at 02:23, Sturla Molden wrote:
> Den 03.07.2012 20:38, skrev Casey W. Stark:
>>
>> Sturla, this is valid Fortran, but I agree it might just be a bad
>> idea. The Fortran 90/95 Explained book mentions this in the
>> allocatable dummy arguments section and has an example using a
Den 04.07.2012 01:59, skrev Sturla Molden:
> But neither was the case here. The allocatable was a dummy variable in
> a subroutine's interface, declared with intent(out). That is an error
> the compiler should trap, because it is doomed to segfault.
Ok, so the answer here seems to be:
In Fortra
Den 03.07.2012 20:38, skrev Casey W. Stark:
>
> Sturla, this is valid Fortran, but I agree it might just be a bad
> idea. The Fortran 90/95 Explained book mentions this in the
> allocatable dummy arguments section and has an example using an array
> with allocatable, intent(out) in a subrountine
Den 03.07.2012 19:24, skrev Pearu Peterson:
>
> One can have allocatable arrays in module data block, for instance, where
> they a global
In Fortran 2003 one can also have allocatable arrays as members in
derived types.
But neither was the case here. The allocatable was a dummy variable in a
su
Hi all.
Thanks for the speedy responses! I'll try to respond to all...
The first idea is to split up the routine into two -- one to compute the
final size of the arrays, and the second to fill them in. I might end up
doing this, because it is simplest, but it means creating the initial
conditions
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:
>
> As for f2py: Allocatable arrays are local variables for internal use,
> and they are not a part of the subroutine's calling interface. f2py only
> needs to know about the interface, not the local variables.
>
One can have allocatable array
Den 03.07.2012 11:54, skrev George Nurser:
>> module zp
>>implicit none
>>contains
>>subroutine ics(..., num_particles, particle_mass, positions, velocities)
>> use data_types, only : dp
>> implicit none
>> ... inputs ...
>> integer, intent(out) :: num_particles
>>
On 7/2/2012 7:17 PM, Casey W. Stark wrote:
Hi numpy.
Does anyone know if f2py supports allocatable arrays, allocated inside
fortran subroutines? The old f2py docs seem to indicate that the
allocatable array must be created with numpy, and dropped in the
module. Here's more background to expla
> Hi numpy.
>
> Does anyone know if f2py supports allocatable arrays, allocated inside
> fortran subroutines? The old f2py docs seem to indicate that the
> allocatable array must be created with numpy, and dropped in the module.
> Here's more background to explain...
>
> I have a fortran subroutine
Can you interface your fortran program twice?
First time return the number of particles, dimensions etc to python
python then creates work array of right size
Second interface pass work array as in/out array, dimension in fortran
argument list, to fortran
fortran copies allocatable arrays to arg
Hi numpy.
Does anyone know if f2py supports allocatable arrays, allocated inside
fortran subroutines? The old f2py docs seem to indicate that the
allocatable array must be created with numpy, and dropped in the module.
Here's more background to explain...
I have a fortran subroutine that returns
Hi all,
I'm trying to hide the actual python callback function on the fortran side
as well as on the python side.
See the example: I want f1 to be the wrapper of my callback, f2 is a
second level where the user has no arg to pass. But if I call f2, for
example in f3, the callback is 'propagated'
On 17.04.2012 07:32, John Mitchell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using f2py to pass a numpy array of type numpy.int8 to fortran. It
> seems like I am misunderstanding something because I just can't make it
> work.
>
> Here is what I am doing.
>
> PYTHON
> b=numpy.array(numpy.zeros(shape=(10,),dtype=numpy.
Hi,
1, 2, 3 are integer literals.
1.0, 3.0e2, -42.0 are real (float) literals
'hello world' is a string literal.
As far as I remember, f2py requires a literal variable for the kind.
The solution I have landed on is to write a pure fortran module (using int8, or
whatever), and then wrap this modu
Thanks Paul.
I suppose this is now going slightly out of bounds for f2py. What I am
looking for is the fortran kind type for a byte. I thought that this was
int8. I guess the question is how to identify the kind type. Although I
have verified that integer(1) seems to work for me, I would real
Ah, come to think of it, I think that f2py only supports literal kind values.
Maybe that's your problem.
Paul
On 17. apr. 2012, at 07:58, Sameer Grover wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 April 2012 11:02 AM, John Mitchell wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am using f2py to pass a numpy array of type numpy.int8 to fort
Thanks Sameer. I confirmed on my side as well. I will try to understand
the why part now. Much appreciated.
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Sameer Grover
wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 April 2012 11:02 AM, John Mitchell wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using f2py to pass a numpy array of type numpy.int8 to
On Tuesday 17 April 2012 11:02 AM, John Mitchell wrote:
Hi,
I am using f2py to pass a numpy array of type numpy.int8 to fortran.
It seems like I am misunderstanding something because I just can't
make it work.
Here is what I am doing.
PYTHON
b=numpy.array(numpy.zeros(shape=(10,),dtype=nump
Hi,
this probably does not help with your problem. However, I would recommend
changing your fortran code to:
subroutine print_bit_array(bits)
use iso_fortran_env
integer(kind=int8),intent(in),dimension(:)::bits
print*,'bits = ',bits
end subroutine print_bit_array
In that way you could p
Hi,
I am using f2py to pass a numpy array of type numpy.int8 to fortran. It
seems like I am misunderstanding something because I just can't make it
work.
Here is what I am doing.
PYTHON
b=numpy.array(numpy.zeros(shape=(10,),dtype=numpy.int8),order='F')
b[0]=1
b[2]=1
b[3]=1
b
array([1, 0, 1, 1,
Hi all,
I've been having an issue with f2py simply ignoring the fortranname
option if the Fortran subroutine is inside an F90 module. That option is
useful for renaming Fortran subroutines.
I don't know if this behaviour is to be expected, or if I am doing
something wrong. I would definitely a
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> On 24 March 2012 13:28, David Froger wrote:
> > I've had similar problem in the past (but on Gnu/Linux), which was solve
> > to by setting the LC_ALL environnement variable to C. (never undersant
> why).
> > (with Bash: export LC_ALL=C)
>
On 24 March 2012 13:28, David Froger wrote:
> I've had similar problem in the past (but on Gnu/Linux), which was solve
> to by setting the LC_ALL environnement variable to C. (never undersant why).
> (with Bash: export LC_ALL=C)
This rings a bell. I have a feeling importing pygtk can change the
P
Excerpts from Sameer Grover's message of ven. mars 09 20:50:06 +0100 2012:
> >>>import gtk
> >>>import foo # where foo is any f2py-wrapped program
>
> Subsequently, on exiting python interpreter, the interpreter crashes
> with this error message - "This application has requested the Runtime
> to t
On Monday 12 March 2012 12:26 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>
> On 3/10/2012 9:31 PM, Sameer Grover wrote:
>> On 10 March 2012 02:23, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3/9/2012 11:50 AM, Sameer Grover wrote:
>>> import gtk
>>> import foo # where foo is any f2py-wrapped program
Subsequ
On 3/10/2012 9:31 PM, Sameer Grover wrote:
> On 10 March 2012 02:23, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/9/2012 11:50 AM, Sameer Grover wrote:
>> import gtk
>> import foo # where foo is any f2py-wrapped program
>>>
>>> Subsequently, on exiting python interpreter, the interpreter crashe
On 10 March 2012 02:23, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>
>
> On 3/9/2012 11:50 AM, Sameer Grover wrote:
> import gtk
> import foo # where foo is any f2py-wrapped program
>>
>> Subsequently, on exiting python interpreter, the interpreter crashes
>> with this error message - "This application has r
On 3/9/2012 11:50 AM, Sameer Grover wrote:
import gtk
import foo # where foo is any f2py-wrapped program
>
> Subsequently, on exiting python interpreter, the interpreter crashes
> with this error message - "This application has requested the Runtime
> to terminate it in an unusual way.
Thank you very much for the clarification. It would be nice if this
were mentioned in the documentation.
Sameer
On 10 March 2012 01:59, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> 09.03.2012 21:05, Sameer Grover kirjoitti:
>> subroutine union ()
>> write(*,*)'Hello from Fortran90!!!'
>> end subroutine union
>>
>
09.03.2012 21:05, Sameer Grover kirjoitti:
> subroutine union ()
>write(*,*)'Hello from Fortran90!!!'
> end subroutine union
>
> f2py is unable to wrap this function. Changing the name of the
> subroutine from 'union' to something else works. I understand that
> problems like these have been r
subroutine union ()
write(*,*)'Hello from Fortran90!!!'
end subroutine union
f2py is unable to wrap this function. Changing the name of the
subroutine from 'union' to something else works. I understand that
problems like these have been reported a long time ago
(http://cens.ioc.ee/pipermail/f2p
>>>import gtk
>>>import foo # where foo is any f2py-wrapped program
Subsequently, on exiting python interpreter, the interpreter crashes
with this error message - "This application has requested the Runtime
to terminate it in an unusual way. Please contact the application's
support team for more i
On 9/12/2011 11:17 AM, Jonathan T. Niehof wrote:
Is anyone successfully using f2py and gfortran on a Windows machine
without relying on cygwin?
SpacePy uses mingw32 for both gcc and gfortran; I didn't have any trouble
with f2py. I haven't tried a build with 64-bit Python or with EPD; I just
buil
> Is anyone successfully using f2py and gfortran on a Windows machine
> without relying on cygwin?
SpacePy uses mingw32 for both gcc and gfortran; I didn't have any trouble
with f2py. I haven't tried a build with 64-bit Python or with EPD; I just
build the installer against python.org's python and
On 9/9/2011 1:59 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>
> On 9/9/2011 12:22 PM, Jim Vickroy wrote:
>> On 9/9/2011 1:14 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>>> On 9/9/2011 11:43 AM, Jim Vickroy wrote:
On 9/9/2011 11:46 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
> On 9/9/2011 7:22 AM, Jim Vickroy wrote:
>> On 9/8/2011
On 9/9/2011 12:22 PM, Jim Vickroy wrote:
> On 9/9/2011 1:14 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>>
>> On 9/9/2011 11:43 AM, Jim Vickroy wrote:
>>> On 9/9/2011 11:46 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
On 9/9/2011 7:22 AM, Jim Vickroy wrote:
> On 9/8/2011 10:44 AM, "V. Armando Solé" wrote:
>> On 08/0
On 9/9/2011 1:14 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>
> On 9/9/2011 11:43 AM, Jim Vickroy wrote:
>> On 9/9/2011 11:46 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>>> On 9/9/2011 7:22 AM, Jim Vickroy wrote:
On 9/8/2011 10:44 AM, "V. Armando Solé" wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 16:16, Jim Vickroy wrote:
>> On 9/8/2011
On 9/9/2011 11:43 AM, Jim Vickroy wrote:
> On 9/9/2011 11:46 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>>
>> On 9/9/2011 7:22 AM, Jim Vickroy wrote:
>>> On 9/8/2011 10:44 AM, "V. Armando Solé" wrote:
On 08/09/2011 16:16, Jim Vickroy wrote:
> On 9/8/2011 6:09 AM, "V. Armando Solé" wrote:
>> Have yo
On 9/9/2011 11:46 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>
> On 9/9/2011 7:22 AM, Jim Vickroy wrote:
>> On 9/8/2011 10:44 AM, "V. Armando Solé" wrote:
>>> On 08/09/2011 16:16, Jim Vickroy wrote:
On 9/8/2011 6:09 AM, "V. Armando Solé" wrote:
> Have you tried to install Visual Studio 2008 Express editi
On 9/9/2011 7:22 AM, Jim Vickroy wrote:
> On 9/8/2011 10:44 AM, "V. Armando Solé" wrote:
>> On 08/09/2011 16:16, Jim Vickroy wrote:
>>> On 9/8/2011 6:09 AM, "V. Armando Solé" wrote:
Have you tried to install Visual Studio 2008 Express edition (plus the
windows SDK to be able to compile
On 9/8/2011 5:56 AM, Jim Vickroy wrote:
> Hello All, I'm attempting to create a python wrapper, for a Fortran
> subroutine, using f2py.
>
> My system details are:
>
> >>> sys.version '2.6.4 (r264:75708, Oct 26 2009, 08:23:19) [MSC v.1500
> 32 bit (Intel)]'
> >>> sys.getwindowsversion() (5
On 9/8/2011 10:44 AM, "V. Armando Solé" wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 16:16, Jim Vickroy wrote:
>> On 9/8/2011 6:09 AM, "V. Armando Solé" wrote:
>>> Have you tried to install Visual Studio 2008 Express edition (plus the
>>> windows SDK to be able to compile 64 bit code)?
>>>
>>> Armando
>> Armando, "Visua
On 08/09/2011 16:16, Jim Vickroy wrote:
> On 9/8/2011 6:09 AM, "V. Armando Solé" wrote:
>> Have you tried to install Visual Studio 2008 Express edition (plus the
>> windows SDK to be able to compile 64 bit code)?
>>
>> Armando
> Armando, "Visual Studio 2008 Professional" is installed on the compute
On 9/8/2011 6:09 AM, "V. Armando Solé" wrote:
> Have you tried to install Visual Studio 2008 Express edition (plus the
> windows SDK to be able to compile 64 bit code)?
>
> Armando
Armando, "Visual Studio 2008 Professional" is installed on the computer
as well as "Intel Visual Fortran Composer XE
Have you tried to install Visual Studio 2008 Express edition (plus the
windows SDK to be able to compile 64 bit code)?
Armando
On 08/09/2011 13:56, Jim Vickroy wrote:
> Hello All, I'm attempting to create a python wrapper, for a Fortran
> subroutine, using f2py.
>
> My system details are:
>
>
Hello All, I'm attempting to create a python wrapper, for a Fortran
subroutine, using f2py.
My system details are:
>>> sys.version '2.6.4 (r264:75708, Oct 26 2009, 08:23:19) [MSC v.1500
32 bit (Intel)]'
>>> sys.getwindowsversion() (5, 1, 2600, 2, 'Service Pack 3')
>>> scipy.__version__ '0.7.
eem to work fine.
Many thanks for your prompt reply.
Regards,
Jin
> -Original Message-
> From: numpy-discussion-boun...@scipy.org
> [mailto:numpy-discussion-boun...@scipy.org] On Behalf Of
> Pearu Peterson
> Sent: Tuesday, 16 August 2011 21:45
> To: Discussion of N
,
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Jose Gomez-Dans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Up to now, I have managed to build Fortran extensions with f2py by ussing
> the following command:
> $ python setup.py config_fc --fcompiler=gnu95
> --f77flags='-fmy_flags' --f90flags='-fmy_flags' build
>
> I think that these op
Hi,
Up to now, I have managed to build Fortran extensions with f2py by ussing
the following command:
$ python setup.py config_fc --fcompiler=gnu95
--f77flags='-fmy_flags' --f90flags='-fmy_flags' build
I think that these options should be able to go in a setup.py file, and use
the f2py_options fi
On 08/16/2011 02:32 PM, Jin Lee wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is my very first attempt at using f2py but I have come across a problem.
> If anyone can assist me I would appreciate it very much.
>
> I have a very simple test Fortran source, sub.f90 which is:
>
> subroutine sub1(x,y)
> implicit non
Hello,
This is my very first attempt at using f2py but I have come across a problem.
If anyone can assist me I would appreciate it very much.
I have a very simple test Fortran source, sub.f90 which is:
subroutine sub1(x,y)
implicit none
integer, intent(in) :: x
integer, intent(out) ::
Hi all,
As Juan said, I didn't include the -lgomp flag for f2py. Once I use that,
the f2py module works with openMP as expected.
Thanks,
Brandt
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:34:13 +0200
> From: Juan
> Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] f2py and ope
Hi Brandt, I am on linux and see the same problem. It is solved (at least here)
if you add at the end the library libgomp, i.e:
f2py -c -m play play.f90 --fcompiler=gfortran --f90flags="-fopenmp" -lgomp
Hope it helps,
Juan
> Hello,
> I'm struggling to create openmp subroutines. I've simplifie
1 - 100 of 366 matches
Mail list logo
