On Wednesday 28 October 2020 21:32:02 Charles Lepple wrote:
> On Oct 26, 2020, at 9:38 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >>> battery.voltage: 24.0
> >>> battery.voltage.nominal: 24
> >>
> >> I don't have the citation handy, but I think another user reported
> >> that the battery.voltage returned by the U
On Oct 24, 2020, at 3:20 PM, Roger Price wrote:
>
> The NUT project uses port 3493 to receive traffic to the upsd server. Unlike
> the protocols http (80) and https (443), NUT has no specific port for
> encrypted traffic. For the upsdTLS.py daemon. I squatted port 563, but it
> would be much
On Oct 27, 2020, at 2:45 PM, Robert Stocker wrote:
>
> Thanks so much for all the help! It looks like at present I've at least got a
> working configuration that I need to test and fine-tune, am I interpreting
> this correctly?
Yes. If you're good with the default NUT behavior of shutting down
On Oct 26, 2020, at 9:38 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
>>> battery.voltage: 24.0
>>> battery.voltage.nominal: 24
>>
>> I don't have the citation handy, but I think another user reported
>> that the battery.voltage returned by the UPS is a constant 24.0 V,
>> regardless of the actual battery voltage.
