On Thursday 26 November 2020 06:55:21 Roger Price wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2020, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
> > raspbian, centos & redhat linux : config sits in /etc/ups, the
> > daemons run as user nut
>
> Sorry for the delay replying. Are you sure that Raspbian uses
> /etc/ups for the configuration
Sorry, my mail did not go out...
For Solaris-like systems, I am aware of the SVR4 packaging recipe in NUT
source tree. This defaults to what the configure script args tell it, on my
box I see /etc/nut for configs in package files, and nobody:nobody as the
account - but I did not see any distributi
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020, Roger Price wrote:
I would like to build a list of the user names and configuration file
locations for the most common distributions which include NUT.
These will be used to produce more user-friendly tools and documentation for
NUT.
Thanks to everyone who replied. Her
On 11/26/20 1:55 PM, Roger Price wrote:
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
raspbian, centos & redhat linux : config sits in /etc/ups, the
daemons run as user nut
Sorry for the delay replying. Are you sure that Raspbian uses
/etc/ups for the configuration? A number of sites are re
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
raspbian, centos & redhat linux : config sits in /etc/ups, the daemons
run as user nut
Sorry for the delay replying. Are you sure that Raspbian uses /etc/ups for the
configuration? A number of sites are reporting /etc/nut which, since Raspbian
i