Re: [Nut-upsuser] RFC - new proposed variables and clarifications for the battery collection in NUT namespace

2021-08-12 Thread Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser
Good proposal, makes sense. Sorry for slow replies, I'm now largely offline for a few weeks coming. Jim On Thu, Aug 12, 2021, 10:55 Roger Price wrote: > On Thu, 12 Aug 2021, Arnaud Quette via Nut-upsuser wrote: > > following a 10 days period after my above announcement, I've considered > the

Re: [Nut-upsuser] RFC - new proposed variables and clarifications for the battery collection in NUT namespace

2021-08-12 Thread Roger Price
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021, Arnaud Quette via Nut-upsuser wrote: following a 10 days period after my above announcement, I've considered the absence of feedback and comments as an implicit approval. I've hence merged the above PRs, which results in the update of the NUT variables names and instant

Re: [Nut-upsuser] RFC - new proposed variables and clarifications for the battery collection in NUT namespace

2021-08-12 Thread Arnaud Quette via Nut-upsuser
Le lun. 2 août 2021 à 15:16, Arnaud Quette a écrit : > Hi there, > > as discussed on the below Github PRs, I've recently proposed some > additional variables to deal with battery information in general, and some > Li-Ion specifics: > > * PR https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/1060/files

Re: [Nut-upsuser] [networkupstools/nut] RFC: clarify and complete battery dates (#1063)

2021-08-12 Thread Arnaud Quette via Nut-upsuser
Le mer. 11 août 2021 à 16:23, Roger Price a écrit : > On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > > Le lun. 9 août 2021 à 15:06, Roger Price a > écrit : > > If nobody has objected after a week, then I suggest > > > > 1) Go ahead with the proposed additions > > 2) Give us