Thanks!
So, comparing this with the January report -- there are no substantial
changes in device discovery process and the collected info.
However, the 10K seems to actually report most of the data which we have
to "guesstimate" in other cases.
Hoping somebody else with QX devices would
jim Klimov
>
> Hello all,
>
> Had another hard look at the PR for QX device voltage/charge/runtime fixes
> for some broken use-cases (AND hoping to not introduce problems for cases
> that were not broken), and hopefully found and rolled back the change which
> in fact introduced the
Thanks! Now trying to make sense of this :) Partially notes to myself,
partially to whoever might want to peek deeper into the driver... If only
we had some active Qx experts (or wanna-be's)!..
@tbsky:
Can you please check if 2.7.4 also reports the huge voltages for the 3kW
and 10kW units, or
Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser
>
> Cheers,
>
> One PR waiting to get into 2.8.1 release timeframe is
> https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/1652 stemming from issue
> https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/1279
>
> The gist of it is that "battery.voltage" and "battery.charge" were
Cheers,
One PR waiting to get into 2.8.1 release timeframe is
https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/1652 stemming from issue
https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/1279
The gist of it is that "battery.voltage" and "battery.charge" were not
always reported correctly with
