Hi,
afaik with Oak the too many child nodes problem of JR2 is solved, therefore
I'm wondering what the best way to store a queue in the repository is?
In my use cases, there are usually not many items within a single queue,
let's say a few hundreds. In some cases the queue might grow to some
thou
hi carsten
if you are expecting your nodes to be in a given order (e.g. the
order of creation) you need to have a parent that has orderable
children... in which case we don't make any promises about huge
child collections... it will not work well.
if you don't have the requirement of ordered chil
Today I run the same scenario, but couldn't reproduce the issue.
I will try to isolate this further, and will reply with more data.
Thanks
Himanshu
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Michael Dürig wrote:
>
>
> On 28.7.14 9:56 , Vikas Saurabh wrote:
>
>> By Java API, I assume you mean doing a sma
Hi,
I can totally see that it might be useful to be able to go through the Oak/JCR
API to have a queue but maybe this is stretching Oak a bit far if you end up
with 1k+ queues.
However I think it would be great to look more into federation for this. I
think ModeShape supports this quite well a
Hi,
I noticed that even if the h2 dependency is now included with a 'test'
scope [0], we still embed it in the jar file [1], is there a need to still
do this or was it simply forgotten?
thanks,
alex
[0]
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/74cbf1ffb40b452195e944704ecb8a63ab273c80
[1]
Thanks Angela,
alright then, as a queue needs ordering the parent needs to be orderable in
which case Oak will not work well.
Which means I need to stick with the ugly workarounds I have already for
JR2.
Carsten
2014-07-30 14:41 GMT+02:00 Angela Schreiber :
> hi carsten
>
> if you are expectin
Using a different storage than JCR would be easy in my case, however I
*want* to use JCR
Carsten
2014-07-30 14:55 GMT+02:00 Lukas Smith :
> Hi,
>
> I can totally see that it might be useful to be able to go through the
> Oak/JCR API to have a queue but maybe this is stretching Oak a bit far if
This is being tracked via OAK-1708. Julian do we still require it or
these can be removed now?
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Alex Parvulescu
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that even if the h2 dependency is now included with a 'test'
> scope [0], we still embed it in the jar file [
