The Apache Jenkins build system has built Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix (build
#778)
Status: Still Failing
Check console output at
https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/778/ to view
the results.
Changes:
[mreutegg] OAK-4085: Malformed node type definition when reregi
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Davide Giannella wrote:
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0.
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast.
>
+1 Release this package as Apache Jackrab
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0
Regards
Julian
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Davide Giannella wrote:
> A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0 release is available at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.4.0/
>
> The release candidate is
Hi,
sorry if i continue to ask you about these critical questions but we'd like to
build on OAK a platform that manage over 200M of documents so we'd like to know
in deep how OAK works.
Query Engine
1. I didn't understand how Traverse recovers phisically the graph to
traverse. Is provided
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0
Davide
Hi,
On 07/03/16 11:51, "Davide Giannella" wrote:
>Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0.
>The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
>least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast.
All checks OK.
+1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbi
On 2016-03-07 11:51, Davide Giannella wrote:
...
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0
Best regards, Julian
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Davide Giannella wrote:
> ...
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.4.0/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.4.0/
The SHA1 checksum of the ar
Hello Team,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Alex Parvulescu
-1 Amit Jain
-1 Davide Giannella
-1 Julian Reschke
-1 Marcel Reutegger
-1 Tommaso Teofili
Thanks for voting. I'll cancel this one.
-- Davide
Cool stuff Tomek! This was something which was discussed in last
Oakathon so great to have a way to do resilience testing
programatically. Would give it a try
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Stefan Egli wrote:
> Hi Tomek,
>
> Would also be interesting to see the effect on the lea
Hi Tomek,
Would also be interesting to see the effect on the leases and thus
discovery-lite under high memory load and network problems.
Cheers,
Stefan
On 04/03/16 11:13, "Tomek Rekawek" wrote:
>Hello,
>
>For some time I've worked on a little project called oak-resilience. It
>aims to be a res
On 4.3.16 11:13 , Tomek Rekawek wrote:
Hello,
For some time I've worked on a little project called oak-resilience. It aims to
be a resilience testing framework for the Oak. It uses virtualisation to run
Java code in a controlled environment, that can be spoilt in different ways, by:
* reset
Hi Tomek,
from a DocumentNodeStore point of view the first and
the last item would be interesting. We do have tests
that check the recovery logic, but we still lack
integration tests on a higher level with multiple
cluster nodes joining, leaving and crashing.
the impact of network issues is IMO a
14 matches
Mail list logo