On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
> I think merging explicit revisions is the only clean solution.
> it is quite a bit of work, but makes sure we have the mergeinfo
> tracked.
Thats what I feared. Would do it the right (hard!) way then.
Chetan Mehrotra
Hi,
I think merging explicit revisions is the only clean solution.
it is quite a bit of work, but makes sure we have the mergeinfo
tracked.
Regards
Marcel
On 30/10/14 09:35, "Davide Giannella" wrote:
>On 29/10/2014 14:24, Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> I need to merge all changes do
On 29/10/2014 14:24, Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I need to merge all changes done in oak-lucene so far to
> branches/1.0/oak-lucene. Is it possible to do via direct command (kind
> of [1]) or I would need to figure out all revisions done in oak-lucene
> and specify them explicilty with sv
Hi Team,
I need to merge all changes done in oak-lucene so far to
branches/1.0/oak-lucene. Is it possible to do via direct command (kind
of [1]) or I would need to figure out all revisions done in oak-lucene
and specify them explicilty with svn merge command?
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
http://www.wandi
