hi jukka
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A lot of functionality in Oak (node states, the diff and hook
> mechanisms, etc.) are based on walking down the tree hierarchy one
> level at a time. To do this, for example to access changes below
> /a/b/c, oak-core will cu
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Stefan Guggisberg
wrote:
> - returning an :id and/or :hash should be optional, i.e. we shouldn't
> require an implementation to return an :id or :hash for every path
Exactly.
> - i suggest we prefix the id/path getNodes parameter value with ':id:'
> and ':
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Stefan Guggisberg
> wrote:
>> - returning an :id and/or :hash should be optional, i.e. we shouldn't
>> require an implementation to return an :id or :hash for every path
>
> Exactly.
>
>> - i sugge
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Stefan Guggisberg
> wrote:
>> - do you have a proposal for the suggested MicroKernel API (java doc)
>> changes?
>
> I'll have one to share shortly...
See the attachment in https://issues.apache.org/j
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Jukka Zitting
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Stefan Guggisberg
>> wrote:
>>> - do you have a proposal for the suggested MicroKernel API (java doc)
>>> changes?
>>
>> I'll have one t
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Stefan Guggisberg
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Jukka Zitting
> wrote:
>> See the attachment in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-468
>
> i committed the API changes, MicroKernelImpl support and adapted
> integration tests in svn r1412898
