On 2016-02-25 12:42, Ancona Francesco wrote:
Hi,
I had run the same test changing only the DocumentNodeStore type as in the
following code:
final DocumentMK.Builder builder = new DocumentMK.Builder();
builder.setBlobStore(createFileSystemBlobStore());
final DocumentNodeStore ns = getMongoDocu
Parvulescu [mailto:alex.parvule...@gmail.com]
Inviato: giovedì 25 febbraio 2016 12:16
A: Oak devs
Cc: Diquigiovanni Simone
Oggetto: Re: R: info about oak and RDMBS
Hi,
I would add making sure the test uses a clean slate each time, meaning you drop
the db at the end and/or create fresh unique
run the test without errors.
Best regards
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.resc...@gmx.de]
Inviato: giovedì 25 febbraio 2016 11:44
A: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Cc: Diquigiovanni Simone
Oggetto: Re: R: info about oak and RDMBS
On 2016-02-25 11:30, Ancona Fr
Hi,
I would add making sure the test uses a clean slate each time, meaning you
drop the db at the end and/or create fresh unique ones each time the test
runs (I don't see this happening in the current snippet).
this would protect you against weird artifacts.
alex
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:43 A
On 2016-02-25 11:30, Ancona Francesco wrote:
Yes.
We tried the following combination:
1) metadata on mongo and binary mongo
2) metadata on mongo and binary using filesystem
Best regards
It looks like the repository construction doesn't work (nodetype index
missing).
Can you double-check th
Yes.
We tried the following combination:
1) metadata on mongo and binary mongo
2) metadata on mongo and binary using filesystem
Best regards
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.resc...@gmx.de]
Inviato: giovedì 25 febbraio 2016 10:56
A: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org