[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16195573#comment-16195573
]
Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-6787:
--
bq. I guess that check would happen at the wiring end though,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16195545#comment-16195545
]
Hudson commented on OAK-6795:
-
Build is still failing.
Failed run: [Jackrabbit Oak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vikas Saurabh resolved OAK-6750.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.7.9
Fixed on trunk at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16195544#comment-16195544
]
Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-6787:
Patch lgtm.
bq. was thinking to use this when NodeStore is of type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vikas Saurabh updated OAK-6792:
---
Description:
Parsing
{noformat}
//element(*, app:Asset)/(rep:facet(jcr:createdBy))
{noformat}
gives
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194824#comment-16194824
]
Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-6735:
bq. I would be in favour of supporting customer defined selectivity
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194749#comment-16194749
]
Amit Jain commented on OAK-6550:
[~catholicon] Yes this should also be solved once this is fixed i.e. once
Hudson created OAK-6795:
---
Summary: Build Jackrabbit Oak #844 failed
Key: OAK-6795
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6795
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194728#comment-16194728
]
Hudson commented on OAK-6788:
-
Previously failing build now is OK.
Passed run: [Jackrabbit Oak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194720#comment-16194720
]
Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-6550:
Follow up to previous comment - this is the warn noticed during
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194679#comment-16194679
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-6735:
-
I would be in favour of supporting customer defined selectivity
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194666#comment-16194666
]
Tomek Rękawek commented on OAK-6633:
Fixed for trunk in [r1811337|https://svn.apache.org/r1811337].
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tomek Rękawek resolved OAK-6633.
Resolution: Fixed
> Overwriting a versionable node with the copy-versions=false doesn't remove
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tomek Rękawek updated OAK-6633:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.7.9
> Overwriting a versionable node with the copy-versions=false doesn't remove
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194639#comment-16194639
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-6776:
-
http://svn.apache.org/r1811334 (trunk)
still missing is: lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated OAK-6789:
Attachment: OAK-6789.diff
Potential fix that swiches to simpler but batched DELETEs instead.
> RDB:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194577#comment-16194577
]
Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-6792:
Oh... yes, you're right... I wanted that to be a column in result
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194571#comment-16194571
]
Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-6550:
[~amjain], just for heads up - one of my team member reported that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yegor Kozlov updated OAK-6794:
--
Attachment: UniquenessConstraintViolatedTest.patch
failing unit test
> oak-upgrade fails to copy nt:file
Yegor Kozlov created OAK-6794:
-
Summary: oak-upgrade fails to copy nt:file node if it was
previously moved
Key: OAK-6794
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6794
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Jörg Hoh created OAK-6793:
-
Summary: Create documentation for MBeans related to the
SegmentStore/BlobStore/FileStore
Key: OAK-6793
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6793
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194543#comment-16194543
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-6792:
-
Yes, currently it looks like this only works with SQL-2,
Vikas Saurabh created OAK-6792:
--
Summary: rep:facet not supported in xpath
Key: OAK-6792
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6792
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Improvement
Jörg Hoh created OAK-6791:
-
Summary: Create documentation for Indexing related MBeans
Key: OAK-6791
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6791
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194484#comment-16194484
]
Julian Reschke edited comment on OAK-6789 at 10/6/17 11:50 AM:
---
Further tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194484#comment-16194484
]
Julian Reschke edited comment on OAK-6789 at 10/6/17 11:50 AM:
---
Further tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194484#comment-16194484
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-6789:
-
Further tests show that it's indeed the condition on MODIFIED
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194472#comment-16194472
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-6789:
-
Further tests show that this is caused by the way we delete in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vikas Saurabh updated OAK-6790:
---
Component/s: (was: lucene)
query
> FacetResult class isn't exposed anymore
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vikas Saurabh updated OAK-6790:
---
Description:
OAK-3847 exposed {{FacetResult}} (rather
{{org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.query.facet}}
Vikas Saurabh created OAK-6790:
--
Summary: FacetResult class isn't exposed anymore
Key: OAK-6790
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6790
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Bug
Julian Reschke created OAK-6789:
---
Summary: RDB: RevisionGC performance on Oracle
Key: OAK-6789
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6789
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194443#comment-16194443
]
Ian Boston edited comment on OAK-6575 at 10/6/17 10:50 AM:
---
At a bundle level yes,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194443#comment-16194443
]
Ian Boston edited comment on OAK-6575 at 10/6/17 10:50 AM:
---
At a bundle level yes,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194443#comment-16194443
]
Ian Boston commented on OAK-6575:
-
At a bundle level yes.
1.6 oak-core vs 1.8-SNAPSHOT oak-api
But not at a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194428#comment-16194428
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-6575:
-
bq. The API in 1.6 is part of oak-core, in 1.8-SNAPSHOT it is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194387#comment-16194387
]
Ian Boston commented on OAK-6575:
-
Doc: Anyone deploying will find it hard to do so without the instructions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194320#comment-16194320
]
Julian Sedding commented on OAK-6741:
-
[~stillalex] I agree that the OSGi testing situation is currently
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194313#comment-16194313
]
Alex Deparvu commented on OAK-6788:
---
{noformat}
java.io.IOException: Backing channel 'ubuntu-1' is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alex Deparvu updated OAK-6788:
--
Summary: java.io.IOException: Backing channel 'ubuntu-1' is disconnected.
(was: Build Jackrabbit Oak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194307#comment-16194307
]
Alex Deparvu commented on OAK-6741:
---
fair enough, I got a little excited as well. My main issue is generic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Sedding updated OAK-6741:
Attachment: OAK-6741-proposed-changes-chetans-feedback.patch
Attached is a tentative patch to address
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194303#comment-16194303
]
Julian Sedding commented on OAK-6741:
-
Thank you [~chetanm] for the list of differences. I'll try to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194264#comment-16194264
]
Julian Sedding edited comment on OAK-6741 at 10/6/17 8:00 AM:
--
bq. Julian
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194264#comment-16194264
]
Julian Sedding commented on OAK-6741:
-
bq. Julian Sedding you might want to check your facts before
Hudson created OAK-6788:
---
Summary: Build Jackrabbit Oak #842 failed
Key: OAK-6788
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6788
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194245#comment-16194245
]
Alex Deparvu commented on OAK-6753:
---
with rev http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1811297=rev I optimized the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194229#comment-16194229
]
angela commented on OAK-6318:
-
[~rombert], thanks for your input. regarding:
{quote}
but maybe copy the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chetan Mehrotra updated OAK-6787:
-
Attachment: OAK-6787-v1.patch
[patch|^OAK-6787-v1.patch] for the same (wiring to cleaner missing)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194224#comment-16194224
]
Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-6218:
--
[~mreutegg] This issue is seen quite a few times now. Would be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16194212#comment-16194212
]
Alex Deparvu commented on OAK-6741:
---
bq. However, I have to wonder, why is there no test coverage for
51 matches
Mail list logo
