[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5970) (Re-)Indexing: estimate progress / ETA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15970766#comment-15970766 ] Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-5970: -- Indexes should store the number of entries in i

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5970) (Re-)Indexing: estimate progress / ETA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16022709#comment-16022709 ] Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-5970: -- Done initial implementation with 1796042 which

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5970) (Re-)Indexing: estimate progress / ETA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16022710#comment-16022710 ] Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-5970: -- As a next step thinking to introduce a SubTreeS

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5970) (Re-)Indexing: estimate progress / ETA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16022719#comment-16022719 ] Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-5970: [~chetanm], I'd prefer bq. ApproximateCounter based

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5970) (Re-)Indexing: estimate progress / ETA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16022724#comment-16022724 ] Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-5970: -- bq. mongo query would still be deep query Ack.

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5970) (Re-)Indexing: estimate progress / ETA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16022731#comment-16022731 ] Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-5970: Umm... even from tooling pov, it'd add load on mong

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5970) (Re-)Indexing: estimate progress / ETA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16022738#comment-16022738 ] Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-5970: -- hmm okie would lock it behind a flag and not us

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5970) (Re-)Indexing: estimate progress / ETA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16022988#comment-16022988 ] Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-5970: -- Done the node counter based implementation with

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5970) (Re-)Indexing: estimate progress / ETA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16023237#comment-16023237 ] Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-5970: -- Added support for include and exclude with 1796

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5970) (Re-)Indexing: estimate progress / ETA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16023240#comment-16023240 ] Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-5970: -- [~tmueller] I am mostly done with this task. Do

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5970) (Re-)Indexing: estimate progress / ETA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16023998#comment-16023998 ] Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-5970: [~chetanm], I think unifying in/excludes after merg

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5970) (Re-)Indexing: estimate progress / ETA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16024547#comment-16024547 ] Davide Giannella commented on OAK-5970: --- If not already, can we expose such informatio

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5970) (Re-)Indexing: estimate progress / ETA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16024584#comment-16024584 ] Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-5970: -- bq. I think unifying in/excludes after merging

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5970) (Re-)Indexing: estimate progress / ETA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16024589#comment-16024589 ] Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-5970: -- bq. can we expose such information via JMX as

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5970) (Re-)Indexing: estimate progress / ETA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16101645#comment-16101645 ] Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-5970: - [~chetanm], with reindexing using oak-run, what i

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5970) (Re-)Indexing: estimate progress / ETA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16104731#comment-16104731 ] Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-5970: -- Yes we can drop jmx support for now. Even for r

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5970) (Re-)Indexing: estimate progress / ETA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16242009#comment-16242009 ] Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-5970: -- Opened OAK-6914 to track further work around im