[jira] [Created] (OAK-10377) ReadOnlyVersionManager#isCheckOut() may return false on a non-versionable node

Manfred Baedke created OAK-10377: Summary: ReadOnlyVersionManager#isCheckOut() may return false on a non-versionable node Key: OAK-10377 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10377 Project: J

[jira] [Assigned] (OAK-10377) ReadOnlyVersionManager#isCheckOut() may return false on a non-versionable node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke reassigned OAK-10377: Assignee: Manfred Baedke > ReadOnlyVersionManager#isCheckOut() may return false on a non-ve

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10374) test coverage for modification of non-versioned node with jcr:isCheckedOut==false property

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17751383#comment-17751383 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10374: -- Interestingly, with the changes to VersionEdi

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10374) test coverage for modification of non-versioned node with jcr:isCheckedOut==false property

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17751563#comment-17751563 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10374: -- Reason for the new failures: VersionEditor#ch

[jira] (OAK-10374) test coverage for modification of non-versioned node with jcr:isCheckedOut==false property

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10374 ] Manfred Baedke deleted comment on OAK-10374: -- was (Author: baedke): Reason for the new failures: VersionEditor#childNodeAdded() and VersionEditor#childNodeDeleted() only behaved correctly bec

[jira] [Created] (OAK-10379) DynamicGroupsTest#testCrossIDPMembership() fails occasionally

Manfred Baedke created OAK-10379: Summary: DynamicGroupsTest#testCrossIDPMembership() fails occasionally Key: OAK-10379 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10379 Project: Jackrabbit Oak

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10293) AzureTarRevisionsTest fails occasionally

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17751651#comment-17751651 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10293: -- I don't know if it's related, but there are o

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-10293) AzureTarRevisionsTest fails occasionally

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17751651#comment-17751651 ] Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-10293 at 8/7/23 12:18 PM: -

[jira] (OAK-10374) test coverage for modification of non-versioned node with jcr:isCheckedOut==false property

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10374 ] Manfred Baedke deleted comment on OAK-10374: -- was (Author: baedke): Interestingly, with the changes to VersionEditor#propertyDeleted() and VersionEditor#propertyAdded() in PR#1049 we get:  

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10377) Checked-out state of non-versionable nodes is not handles correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-10377: - Summary: Checked-out state of non-versionable nodes is not handles correctly (was: ReadOnlyVersio

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10377) Checked-out state of non-versionable nodes is not handled correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-10377: - Summary: Checked-out state of non-versionable nodes is not handled correctly (was: Checked-out st

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10377) Checked-out state of non-versionable nodes is not handled correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-10377: - Description: The implementation always uses the value of the property jcr:isCheckedOut if it's pre

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10377) Checked-out state of non-versionable nodes is not handled correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17751693#comment-17751693 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10377: -- PR#1051 should fix it. > Checked-out state o

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10288) mvn test for oak-commons fails in top level directory, but not in project directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17751939#comment-17751939 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10288: -- [~reschke], That is reasonable. When the com

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-10288) mvn test for oak-commons fails in top level directory, but not in project directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17751939#comment-17751939 ] Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-10288 at 8/8/23 8:11 AM: --

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10288) mvn test for oak-commons fails in top level directory, but not in project directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17751950#comment-17751950 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10288: -- To solve this, I think we'd have to attach th

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-10288) mvn test for oak-commons fails in top level directory, but not in project directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17751950#comment-17751950 ] Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-10288 at 8/8/23 9:00 AM: --

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10288) mvn test for oak-commons fails in top level directory, but not in project directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17751971#comment-17751971 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10288: -- One way to solve it: use released version of

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-10288) mvn test for oak-commons fails in top level directory, but not in project directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17751971#comment-17751971 ] Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-10288 at 8/8/23 9:14 AM: --

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10288) mvn test for oak-commons fails in top level directory, but not in project directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17751975#comment-17751975 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10288: -- Yes, just how it was done with Guava or any o

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7793) RDB*Store: provide support for testing with mysql inside docker

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-7793: Priority: Minor (was: Major) > RDB*Store: provide support for testing with mysql inside docker > ---

[jira] [Assigned] (OAK-10379) DynamicGroupsTest#testCrossIDPMembership() fails occasionally

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke reassigned OAK-10379: Assignee: Manfred Baedke > DynamicGroupsTest#testCrossIDPMembership() fails occasionally >

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10379) DynamicGroupsTest#testCrossIDPMembership() fails occasionally

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17752062#comment-17752062 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10379: -- Since DynamicGroupsTest uses the same instanc

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-10379) DynamicGroupsTest#testCrossIDPMembership() fails occasionally

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17752062#comment-17752062 ] Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-10379 at 8/8/23 2:17 PM: --

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10379) DynamicGroupsTest#testCrossIDPMembership() fails occasionally

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17752337#comment-17752337 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10379: -- Fixed with PR#1054. > DynamicGroupsTest#test

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10379) DynamicGroupsTest#testCrossIDPMembership() fails occasionally

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17752371#comment-17752371 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10379: -- trunk: [1982aebf|https://github.com/apache/j

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10379) DynamicGroupsTest#testCrossIDPMembership() fails occasionally

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke resolved OAK-10379. -- Resolution: Fixed > DynamicGroupsTest#testCrossIDPMembership() fails occasionally >

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10377) Checked-out state of non-versionable nodes is not handled correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17758559#comment-17758559 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10377: -- Unfortunately, the ReadOnlyVersionManager pat

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-10377) Checked-out state of non-versionable nodes is not handled correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17758559#comment-17758559 ] Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-10377 at 8/24/23 12:35 PM:

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-10377) Checked-out state of non-versionable nodes is not handled correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17758559#comment-17758559 ] Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-10377 at 8/24/23 12:35 PM:

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10448) org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.user.Query must be a Consumer type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17765496#comment-17765496 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10448: -- ??For both org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10377) Checked-out state of non-versionable nodes is not handled correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17766764#comment-17766764 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10377: -- Created new PR#1126 because I messed up PR#10

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10374) test coverage for modification of non-versioned node with jcr:isCheckedOut==false property

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17767535#comment-17767535 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10374: -- trunk: [f8a06bc2|https://github.com/apache/j

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10377) Checked-out state of non-versionable nodes is not handled correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-10377: - Fix Version/s: 1.58.0 > Checked-out state of non-versionable nodes is not handled correctly >

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10374) test coverage for modification of non-versioned node with jcr:isCheckedOut==false property

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-10374: - Fix Version/s: 1.58.0 > test coverage for modification of non-versioned node with > jcr:isChecked

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10374) test coverage for modification of non-versioned node with jcr:isCheckedOut==false property

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke resolved OAK-10374. -- Resolution: Fixed > test coverage for modification of non-versioned node with > jcr:isCheckedOu

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10377) Checked-out state of non-versionable nodes is not handled correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17767540#comment-17767540 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10377: -- trunk: [f8a06bc2|https://github.com/apache/j

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10377) Checked-out state of non-versionable nodes is not handled correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke resolved OAK-10377. -- Resolution: Fixed > Checked-out state of non-versionable nodes is not handled correctly > --

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-10374) test coverage for modification of non-versioned node with jcr:isCheckedOut==false property

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17767535#comment-17767535 ] Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-10374 at 9/21/23 12:41 PM:

[jira] [Assigned] (OAK-10462) Restoring the node doesn't check for versionable mixin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke reassigned OAK-10462: Assignee: Manfred Baedke > Restoring the node doesn't check for versionable mixin > ---

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10462) o.a.j.o.plugins.version.VersionEditor#propertyAdded() may mistakenly assume an ongoing restore operation.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-10462: - Summary: o.a.j.o.plugins.version.VersionEditor#propertyAdded() may mistakenly assume an ongoing re

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10462) o.a.j.o.plugins.version.VersionEditor.propertyAdded may mistakenly assume an ongoing restore operation.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-10462: - Summary: o.a.j.o.plugins.version.VersionEditor.propertyAdded may mistakenly assume an ongoing rest

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10462) o.a.j.o.plugins.version.VersionEditor#propertyAdded() may mistakenly assume an ongoing restore operation.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17771041#comment-17771041 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10462: -- I changed the title to better reflect the act

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-10462) o.a.j.o.plugins.version.VersionEditor#propertyAdded() may mistakenly assume an ongoing restore operation.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17771041#comment-17771041 ] Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-10462 at 10/2/23 10:55 AM:

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-10462) o.a.j.o.plugins.version.VersionEditor#propertyAdded() may mistakenly assume an ongoing restore operation.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17771041#comment-17771041 ] Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-10462 at 10/2/23 10:57 AM:

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10462) o.a.j.o.plugins.version.VersionEditor#propertyAdded() may mistakenly assume an ongoing restore operation.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17773285#comment-17773285 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10462: -- PR#1141 improves the heuristics used to ident

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10462) o.a.j.o.plugins.version.VersionEditor#propertyAdded() may mistakenly assume an ongoing restore operation.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke resolved OAK-10462. -- Fix Version/s: 1.58.0 Resolution: Fixed > o.a.j.o.plugins.version.VersionEditor#propertyA

[jira] [Reopened] (OAK-10462) o.a.j.o.plugins.version.VersionEditor#propertyAdded() may mistakenly assume an ongoing restore operation.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke reopened OAK-10462: -- > o.a.j.o.plugins.version.VersionEditor#propertyAdded() may mistakenly assume > an ongoing restore

[jira] [Assigned] (OAK-9459) ConstraintViolationException in VersionManagerImplRestore when target node has a property definition unknown by the frozen node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke reassigned OAK-9459: --- Assignee: Manfred Baedke > ConstraintViolationException in VersionManagerImplRestore when targ

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-9459) ConstraintViolationException in VersionManagerImplRestore when target node has a property definition unknown by the frozen node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17773931#comment-17773931 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-9459: - PR#1146: Avoiding constraint violation by retrie

[jira] [Created] (OAK-10485) o.a.j.test.api.version.WorkspaceRestoreTest is excluded for no apparent reason

Manfred Baedke created OAK-10485: Summary: o.a.j.test.api.version.WorkspaceRestoreTest is excluded for no apparent reason Key: OAK-10485 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10485 Project: J

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10485) o.a.j.test.api.version.WorkspaceRestoreTest is excluded for no apparent reason

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke resolved OAK-10485. -- Resolution: Invalid Opened by mistake. > o.a.j.test.api.version.WorkspaceRestoreTest is exclude

[jira] [Assigned] (OAK-10478) Update Mockito dependency to 5.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke reassigned OAK-10478: Assignee: Manfred Baedke (was: Julian Reschke) > Update Mockito dependency to 5.x > --

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-9459) ConstraintViolationException in VersionManagerImplRestore when target node has a property definition unknown by the frozen node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780297#comment-17780297 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-9459: - New PR#1183 including [~reschke] 's suggested ch

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-9459) ConstraintViolationException in VersionManagerImplRestore when target node has a property definition unknown by the frozen node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780299#comment-17780299 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-9459: - trunk: [9014aff8|https://github.com/apache/jack

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-9459) ConstraintViolationException in VersionManagerImplRestore when target node has a property definition unknown by the frozen node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-9459: Fix Version/s: 1.60.0 > ConstraintViolationException in VersionManagerImplRestore when target node >

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-9459) ConstraintViolationException in VersionManagerImplRestore when target node has a property definition unknown by the frozen node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke resolved OAK-9459. - Resolution: Fixed > ConstraintViolationException in VersionManagerImplRestore when target node > h

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-9459) ConstraintViolationException in VersionManagerImplRestore when target node has a property definition unknown by the frozen node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780299#comment-17780299 ] Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-9459 at 10/27/23 10:17 AM: -

[jira] [Created] (OAK-10521) Update Easymock dependency to 5.2

Manfred Baedke created OAK-10521: Summary: Update Easymock dependency to 5.2 Key: OAK-10521 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10521 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Technical

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10521) Update Easymock dependency to 5.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-10521: - Component/s: parent > Update Easymock dependency to 5.2 > - > >

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10521) Update Easymock dependency to 5.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-10521: - Description: Though Easymock 3 is currently working for us, it's known to be not fully functional

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-10478) Update Mockito dependency to 5.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780341#comment-17780341 ] Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-10478 at 10/27/23 12:19 PM: ---

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10478) Update Mockito dependency to 5.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke resolved OAK-10478. -- Resolution: Done > Update Mockito dependency to 5.x > > >

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10478) Update Mockito dependency to 5.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-10478: - Fix Version/s: 1.60.0 > Update Mockito dependency to 5.x > > >

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10478) Update Mockito dependency to 5.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780341#comment-17780341 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10478: -- trunk: [f12b4159|https://github.com/apache/j

[jira] [Created] (OAK-10522) o.a.j.o.index.ReindexIT#reindexIgnoreMissingTikaDepThrow() fails with Java 21

Manfred Baedke created OAK-10522: Summary: o.a.j.o.index.ReindexIT#reindexIgnoreMissingTikaDepThrow() fails with Java 21 Key: OAK-10522 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10522 Project: J

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10522) o.a.j.o.index.ReindexIT#reindexIgnoreMissingTikaDepThrow() fails with Java 21

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-10522: - Description: {code:java} [INFO] Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.index.ReindexIT [ERROR] Tests ru

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10522) o.a.j.o.index.ReindexIT#reindexIgnoreMissingTikaDepThrow() fails with Java 21

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780361#comment-17780361 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10522: -- The test case uses a custom SecurityManager t

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10521) Update Easymock dependency to 5.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780947#comment-17780947 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10521: -- trunk: [facfe0e5|https://github.com/apache/j

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10521) Update Easymock dependency to 5.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-10521: - Fix Version/s: 1.60.0 > Update Easymock dependency to 5.2 > - > >

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10521) Update Easymock dependency to 5.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke resolved OAK-10521. -- Resolution: Fixed > Update Easymock dependency to 5.2 > - > >

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-10521) Update Easymock dependency to 5.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780947#comment-17780947 ] Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-10521 at 10/30/23 10:33 AM: ---

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10462) o.a.j.o.plugins.version.VersionEditor#propertyAdded() may mistakenly assume an ongoing restore operation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-10462: - Fix Version/s: 1.60.0 > o.a.j.o.plugins.version.VersionEditor#propertyAdded() may mistakenly assum

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10462) o.a.j.o.plugins.version.VersionEditor#propertyAdded() may mistakenly assume an ongoing restore operation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17782506#comment-17782506 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10462: -- trunk: [30a9407e|https://github.com/apache/j

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-10462) o.a.j.o.plugins.version.VersionEditor#propertyAdded() may mistakenly assume an ongoing restore operation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17782506#comment-17782506 ] Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-10462 at 11/3/23 10:26 AM:

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10462) o.a.j.o.plugins.version.VersionEditor#propertyAdded() may mistakenly assume an ongoing restore operation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke resolved OAK-10462. -- Resolution: Fixed > o.a.j.o.plugins.version.VersionEditor#propertyAdded() may mistakenly assume

[jira] [Assigned] (OAK-10522) o.a.j.o.index.ReindexIT#reindexIgnoreMissingTikaDepThrow() fails with Java 21

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke reassigned OAK-10522: Assignee: Manfred Baedke (was: Julian Reschke) > o.a.j.o.index.ReindexIT#reindexIgnoreMiss

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10522) o.a.j.o.index.ReindexIT#reindexIgnoreMissingTikaDepThrow() fails with Java 21

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-10522: - Summary: o.a.j.o.index.ReindexIT#reindexIgnoreMissingTikaDepThrow() fails with Java 21 (was: o.a.

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10522) o.a.j.o.index.ReindexIT#reindexIgnoreMissingTikaDepThrow() fails with Java 21

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17782595#comment-17782595 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10522: -- ??In which case it seems /much/ simpler just

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10522) o.a.j.o.index.ReindexIT#reindexIgnoreMissingTikaDepThrow() fails with Java 21

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17782596#comment-17782596 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10522: -- trunk: [1d17b0e5|https://github.com/apache/j

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10522) o.a.j.o.index.ReindexIT#reindexIgnoreMissingTikaDepThrow() fails with Java 21

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-10522: - Fix Version/s: 1.60.0 > o.a.j.o.index.ReindexIT#reindexIgnoreMissingTikaDepThrow() fails with Java

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-10522) o.a.j.o.index.ReindexIT#reindexIgnoreMissingTikaDepThrow() fails with Java 21

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17782596#comment-17782596 ] Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-10522 at 11/3/23 2:42 PM: -

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10522) o.a.j.o.index.ReindexIT#reindexIgnoreMissingTikaDepThrow() fails with Java 21

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke resolved OAK-10522. -- Resolution: Fixed > o.a.j.o.index.ReindexIT#reindexIgnoreMissingTikaDepThrow() fails with Java 2

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10477) Oak should compile & test on Java 21

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke resolved OAK-10477. -- Resolution: Done > Oak should compile & test on Java 21 > >

[jira] [Created] (OAK-10531) Jacoco produces a lot of exceptions with Java 21

Manfred Baedke created OAK-10531: Summary: Jacoco produces a lot of exceptions with Java 21 Key: OAK-10531 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10531 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue T

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-9024) oak-solr-osgi imports org.slf4j.impl

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17783603#comment-17783603 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-9024: - Not the case anymore. > oak-solr-osgi imports o

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-6757) Convert oak-auth-ldap to OSGi R6 annotations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17783996#comment-17783996 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-6757: - [https://github.com/jsedding/osgi-ds-metatype-di

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-6757) Convert oak-auth-ldap to OSGi R6 annotations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17783996#comment-17783996 ] Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-6757 at 11/8/23 11:40 AM: --

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-6757) Convert oak-auth-ldap to OSGi R6 annotations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17783996#comment-17783996 ] Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-6757 at 11/8/23 11:41 AM: --

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-6757) Convert oak-auth-ldap to OSGi R6 annotations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17783997#comment-17783997 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-6757: - Also smoke tested in AEM. > Convert oak-auth-ld

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-6757) Convert oak-auth-ldap to OSGi R6 annotations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17783997#comment-17783997 ] Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-6757 at 11/8/23 2:14 PM: --

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-6741) Switch to official OSGi component and metatype annotations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17784909#comment-17784909 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-6741: - All the sub tasks titles suggest we are switchin

[jira] [Assigned] (OAK-6765) Convert oak-jcr to OSGi R6 annotations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke reassigned OAK-6765: --- Assignee: Manfred Baedke > Convert oak-jcr to OSGi R6 annotations > --

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-6741) Switch to official OSGi component and metatype annotations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17784909#comment-17784909 ] Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-6741 at 11/10/23 12:24 PM: -

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-6741) Switch to official OSGi component and metatype annotations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17784912#comment-17784912 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-6741: - [~rombert] Fine, then I'll change the titles. >

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-6741) Switch to official OSGi component and metatype annotations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17784916#comment-17784916 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-6741: - [~reschke] , all the changes already done work w

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-6741) Switch to official OSGi component and metatype annotations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17784916#comment-17784916 ] Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-6741 at 11/10/23 12:29 PM: -

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6774) Convert oak-upgrade to OSGi R7 annotations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-6774: Summary: Convert oak-upgrade to OSGi R7 annotations (was: Convert oak-upgrade to OSGi R6 annotations

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6773) Convert oak-store-composite to OSGi R7 annotations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-6773: Summary: Convert oak-store-composite to OSGi R7 annotations (was: Convert oak-store-composite to OSG

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6770) Convert oak-segment-tar to OSGi R7 annotations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-6770: Summary: Convert oak-segment-tar to OSGi R7 annotations (was: Convert oak-segment-tar to OSGi R6 ann

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >