+1
"Richer, Justin P." schrieb:
>Good for me, AS LONG AS we make absolutely SURE that we leave plenty of
>time for #8 on the agenda, to the point of cutting off and tabling
>other discussions ahead of time. There are a lot of ancillary documents
>in various states of use/neglect that shouldn't
Hi，Prabath
Prabath Siriwardena
2012-10-09 20:35
收件人
zhou.suj...@zte.com.cn
抄送
Eve Maler , oauth@ietf.org, oauth-boun...@ietf.org
主题
Re: Re: Re: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Resource owner initiated OAuth delegation
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:24 PM, wrote:
Hi， Prabath
My question is since clien
Good for me, AS LONG AS we make absolutely SURE that we leave plenty of time
for #8 on the agenda, to the point of cutting off and tabling other discussions
ahead of time. There are a lot of ancillary documents in various states of
use/neglect that shouldn't be left aside by the WG, and this is
As a vendor we can't really share deployment particulars of our customers.
But we've had product support for the SAML authorization grant for some
time now. So I can point to some online documentation for the support we
provide in our PingFederate product as an AS,
http://documentation.pingidentity
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:24 PM, wrote:
>
> Hi， Prabath
>
> My question is since client-id is public, then it is a waste to get it
> by granting an access-token.
> And in step 2."Resource Owner grants access to a selected Client", RO
> logins in to select clients to be delegated,
> and RS re
