Re: [OAUTH-WG] Review of draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token-05

2012-12-10 Thread Mike Jones
Thanks for the review comments, Hannes. Replies are inline in green... -- Mike -Original Message- From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig Sent: Sunday, November 25, 20

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Please review draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token

2012-12-10 Thread Mike Jones
Thanks for the comments, Prateek. Replies inline in green... -- Mike From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of prateek mishra Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 7:16 AM To: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion Framework - Why does issuer have to be either the client or a third party token service?

2012-12-10 Thread zhou . sujing
In "section 3 The token service is the assertion issuer; its role is to fulfill requests from clients, which present various credentials, and mint assertions as requested, fill them with appropriate information, and sign them." As I understand, an assertion generated by a STS, is done flollow

[OAUTH-WG] Last Call: (Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0) to Proposed Standard

2012-12-10 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the Web Authorization Protocol WG (oauth) to consider the following document: - 'Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substan

[OAUTH-WG] Using structured access_token as grant type in assertion flow

2012-12-10 Thread Lewis Adam-CAL022
Hi, I continue to have an interest in the OAuth assertion profiles for my use cases. I'm wondering if the idea of performing a first OAuth dance which returns to the client a structured JWT access token (with scope=AS for example) could then be used as the JWT in an assertion grant type? So s

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Writeup for Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0

2012-12-10 Thread Stephen Farrell
Hi Hannes, all, Sorry to have been slow with the AD review here. I've only a few comments (below) that can be handled as IETF LC comments. Any changes as a result of the recent thread on the definition of Issuer can also be done then. Unless someone tells me to hold off for a new version, I'll r