Re: [OAUTH-WG] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-mtls-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

I missed responding to this one part below about sec 7.2 and yet somehow remembered that I'd missed it. Anyway, I feel like I had some seemingly legitimate reason for mentioning (first) preimage when I wrote that text but I cannot recall what that was and, on reading the text again with the benefit

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-mtls-16: (with COMMENT)

Thanks Adam, I attempt to provide not-too-terrible replies to your comments inline below. On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 8:02 PM Adam Roach via Datatracker wrote: > -- > COMMENT: > --

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-mtls-16: (with COMMENT)

Thanks Suresh, I'll consider using RFC5952 there as I try and work though some other comments on that parameter in that section. On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 1:16 PM Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > > -- >

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-mtls-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Thanks Ben, I attempt (over the course of many hours) to respond to your comments and discuss your discuss inline below. On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 4:15 PM Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-oauth-mtls