Re: [OAUTH-WG] R: [SPICE] OAuth Digital Credential Status Attestations (typo)

2024-02-06 Thread Giuseppe De Marco
Ciao Tom, Forgive the delay in replying to you, I rarely find pleasure in discussion as in moments of sharing with you. I feel every responsibility for not being able to describe its purposes in the introduction of the specification, this is clear to me from your comment below. > That's far worse

Re: [OAUTH-WG] R: [SPICE] OAuth Digital Credential Status Attestations (typo)

2024-02-06 Thread Giuseppe De Marco
Hi Denis, sorry for the delay, below by points. > A *digital credential* may be presented to a verifier long after it has been issued. In the abstract we say what's the status attestation. Probably it's an editorial suggestion from you to say what's the substantial difference between the digital

Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-status-list-01.txt

2024-02-06 Thread Tom Jones
I think the proposal should be renamed as optimized data mining. AIs around the world will love the idea. Herd privacy is utter nonsense and has been from the beginning. On Tue, Feb 6, 2024, 5:08 AM Denis wrote: > Comments on draft-ietf-oauth-status-list-01.txt > > The text states: > > *11.* *Pr

Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-status-list-01.txt

2024-02-06 Thread Denis
Comments on draft-ietf-oauth-status-list-01.txt The text states: *11.Privacy Considerations* * **11.1.Issuer tracking and Herd Privacy* The main privacy consideration for a Status List, especially in the context of the *Issuer-Holder-Verifier model,* is to prevent the Issu