oauth-boun...@ietf.org wrote on 27/03/2011 09:19:58:
Eran Hammer-Lahav e...@hueniverse.com
Sent by: oauth-boun...@ietf.org
Subject
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authors, Contributors, Acknowledgement
I guess you can sort it out at the meeting. I thought the plan was
to distill the security document
I'm fine with any of the options Eran proposed.
The document has become much more Eran's than anyone else's which leads me to
lean towards just listing Eran as the editor.
-- Dick
On 2011-03-27, at 1:43 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
hat type='AD'/
On 3/27/11 12:36 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav
On the security aspect: I will write a short text for the OAuth draft because
the longer writeup by Torsten/Mar/Phil is targeting a different scope. So, you
cannot just copy it.
On Mar 27, 2011, at 12:36 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
The security consideration section pending, this is the
: Hannes Tschofenig; OAuth WG
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authors, Contributors, Acknowledgement
On the security aspect: I will write a short text for the OAuth draft because
the longer writeup by Torsten/Mar/Phil is targeting a different scope. So, you
cannot just copy it.
On Mar 27, 2011, at 12
That's what I thought was the plan.
(Assuming the working group agrees to work on a separate document. I would
support it.)
On Mar 27, 2011, at 10:03 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
So the new plan is for you to provide the text for the security section and
just publish their work as a
Hannes Tschofenig hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net schrieb:
That's what I thought was the plan. (Assuming the working group agrees to work
on a separate document. I would support it.) On Mar 27, 2011, at 10:03 AM, Eran
Hammer-Lahav wrote: So the new plan is for you to provide the text for the
-Original Message-
From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net]
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 1:10 AM
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav
Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; OAuth WG
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authors, Contributors, Acknowledgement
That's what I thought was the plan.
(Assuming
hat type='AD'/
On 3/27/11 12:36 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
The security consideration section pending, this is the last open issue
I have to close as editor before the document is ready to leave the
working group. While this is silly business for many, it is very
important to others, so
Message- From: Hannes Tschofenig
[mailto:hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net] Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011
1:10 AM To: Eran Hammer-Lahav Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; OAuth WG
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authors, Contributors, Acknowledgement
That's what I thought was the plan. (Assuming the working group
Any of #1-#3 are fine with me.
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav e...@hueniverse.com wrote:
The security consideration section pending, this is the last open issue I
have to close as editor before the document is ready to leave the working
group. While this is silly business
The security consideration section pending, this is the last open issue I have
to close as editor before the document is ready to leave the working group.
While this is silly business for many, it is very important to others, so bear
with me. I want to make sure we give everyone the proper
11 matches
Mail list logo
