Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft 16 comment

2011-07-04 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 21:40:22 -0700 To: oauth@ietf.orgmailto:oauth@ietf.org oauth@ietf.orgmailto:oauth@ietf.org Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Draft 16 comment First, I'd like to add my support for Brian Eaton's comments on Draft 16. They actually helped clarify the comment I have below I found

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft 16 comment

2011-06-28 Thread Lodderstedt, Torsten
malicious clients (maleware, viruses). regards, Torsten. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Mark Mcgloin [mailto:mark.mcgl...@ie.ibm.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Juni 2011 12:26 An: Shane B Weeden Cc: oauth@ietf.org; oauth-boun...@ietf.org Betreff: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft 16 comment

[OAUTH-WG] Draft 16 comment

2011-05-22 Thread Shane B Weeden
First, I'd like to add my support for Brian Eaton's comments on Draft 16. They actually helped clarify the comment I have below I found section 9 to be in contradiction to a part of section 6. In particular in section 9: Native applications SHOULD use the authorization code grant type