Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-campbell-oauth-resource-indicators-01.txt

2016-04-05 Thread John Bradley
;http://www.mail-wise.com/installation/2> – See your emails > as clean, short chats. > > > > -------- Originalnachricht ---- > Betreff: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: New Version Notification for > draft-campbell-oauth-resource-indicators-01.txt > Von: Brian Campbell > An

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-campbell-oauth-resource-indicators-01.txt

2016-04-05 Thread tors...@lodderstedt.net
. Originalnachricht Betreff: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-campbell-oauth-resource-indicators-01.txt Von: Brian Campbell An: Torsten Lodderstedt Cc: oauth >Sorry for the slow response, Torsten, I was on vacation last week with my >family. > >The omission of sco

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-campbell-oauth-resource-indicators-01.txt

2016-04-05 Thread Brian Campbell
Sorry for the slow response, Torsten, I was on vacation last week with my family. The omission of scope values in the example requests wasn't really intentional so much as just an initial desire to have a minimal amount of stuff in the examples. Adding a scope parameter to the example authorizatio

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-campbell-oauth-resource-indicators-01.txt

2016-04-02 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
Hi Brian, did you intentionally omit scope values in your example requests? I would like to know what you envision to be the relationshop between scope and resource. As you draft says, we today use scope values to indicate to the AS, which ressource servers the clients wants to access. I think

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-campbell-oauth-resource-indicators-01.txt

2016-03-22 Thread Brian Campbell
'aud' can't be used b/c it conflicts with the (yet to be registered) 'aud' claim/parameter in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq and JWS/E requests in Connect (honestly, I'd like to use aud because we've already done so in product but I don't think it works given the spec landscape

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-campbell-oauth-resource-indicators-01.txt

2016-03-22 Thread Brian Campbell
I don't consider this draft to be a direct alternative to the bound config thing. It aims to fill a need that the WG has discussed several times previously. It happens to also facilitate getting audience restrictions into ATs, which address the concerns about a bad RS using an AT at a good RS that

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-campbell-oauth-resource-indicators-01.txt

2016-03-22 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi Is there any reason why 'resource' parameter can not be named 'aud' or 'audience' ? The text says "AS should audience restrict" the access token and that a token 'aud' property may be equal to this "resource" value. I guess 'audience' is a pure access token property, while as far as cli

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-campbell-oauth-resource-indicators-01.txt

2016-03-21 Thread Phil Hunt
What about server processing rules and error conditions? The client passes the resource in with every request. What happens if it sends a bad URL. I see the registration for invalid_resource, but I see no processing logic for the server that describes when that is returned. I’ll assume that i

[OAUTH-WG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-campbell-oauth-resource-indicators-01.txt

2016-03-21 Thread Brian Campbell
Very minor update to this draft before the deadline that moves Hannes from Acknowledgements to Authors in acknowledgment of his similar work a few years ago. Also fleshed out the IANA section with the formal registration requests. -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Mon, Mar 21,