[OAUTH-WG] OAUTH for Web Proxy authentication

2023-01-22 Thread Markus PlusNet
Dear WG, I am new to oauth and wonder which WG would be responsible for reviewing a Spec for Proxy authentication https://httpwg.org/specs/rfc9110.html#auth.client.proxy using oauth or does that spec already exist ? Thank you Markus ___ OAuth mai

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH for Web Proxy authentication

2023-01-28 Thread George Fletcher
To my knowledge that spec doesn't exist. I'll let others chime in if they have seen a proposal in that regard. In regards to which working group, given the core topic is OAuth authorization, I would present it here at a minimum. Thanks, George On 1/22/23 7:06 AM, Markus PlusNet wrote: Dear

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH for Web Proxy authentication

2023-01-28 Thread Markus
Thank you. Regards Markus From: George Fletcher Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2023 1:43 PM To: Markus; oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH for Web Proxy authentication To my knowledge that spec doesn't exist. I'll let others chime in if they have seen a proposal in that r

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH for Web Proxy authentication

2023-01-30 Thread Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
y 28, 2023 1:43 PM > *To:* Markus; oauth@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH for Web Proxy authentication > > To my knowledge that spec doesn't exist. I'll let others chime in if they > have seen a proposal in that regard. > > In regards to which working group,

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH for Web Proxy authentication

2023-01-30 Thread Markus
proxy based controls at their borders to the Internet. Regards Markus From: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef Sent: Monday, January 30, 2023 6:12 PM To: Markus Cc: oauth@ietf.org ; George Fletcher Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH for Web Proxy authentication Hi Markus, As Goerge mentioned, there is no such

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH for Web Proxy authentication

2023-01-31 Thread Warren Parad
till require proxy > based controls at their borders to the Internet. > > Regards > Markus > > *From:* Rifaat Shekh-Yusef > *Sent:* Monday, January 30, 2023 6:12 PM > *To:* Markus > *Cc:* oauth@ietf.org ; George Fletcher > *Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH for Web P

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH for Web Proxy authentication

2023-01-31 Thread Neil Madden
o the Internet. > > Regards > Markus > > From: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <> > Sent: Monday, January 30, 2023 6:12 PM > To: Markus <> > Cc: oauth@ietf.org <> ; George Fletcher <> > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH for Web Proxy authentication &g

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH for Web Proxy authentication

2023-01-31 Thread Markus
@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH for Web Proxy authentication Right - RFC 6750 doesn't explicitly define how to send an access token with the Proxy-Authorization/Proxy-Authenticate headers, but states: The Bearer authentication scheme is intended primarily for server authentication