[OAUTH-WG] Re: OAuth 2.0 Protected Resource Metadata - Implementations

2024-07-10 Thread Giuseppe De Marco
Hi This Is not the first time I support this draft and say that, two years ago, I was looking for an RS metadata scheme for the spid attribuite authorities specification I found Mike's I-D and considered the deadline I had, together with other collegues of other national agencies, we decided to u

[OAUTH-WG] Re: OAuth 2.0 Protected Resource Metadata - Implementations

2024-07-10 Thread Atul Tulshibagwale
If it makes sense, we could add an "Implementation Status" section, like it is proposed in this RFC: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7942.html On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 10:43 AM Michael Jones wrote: > OpenID Federation implementations use the Protected Resource Metadata > definitions in this spe

[OAUTH-WG] Re: OAuth 2.0 Protected Resource Metadata - Implementations

2024-07-10 Thread Matt Harrell
John Doi On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 9:13 PM Michael Jones wrote: > OpenID Federation implementations use the Protected Resource Metadata > definitions in this specification. Among others, Connect2ID and Authlete > have OpenID Federation implementations. I know that it’s deployed in the > Italian

[OAUTH-WG] Re: OAuth 2.0 Protected Resource Metadata - Implementations

2024-07-10 Thread Michael Jones
OpenID Federation implementations use the Protected Resource Metadata definitions in this specification. Among others, Connect2ID and Authlete have OpenID Federation implementations. I know that it's deployed in the Italian SPID CIE national federation.