On 2010-06-22, at 11:07 PM, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:
> "
> scope
> OPTIONAL. The scope of the access request expressed as a list
> of space-delimited strings. The value of the "scope" parameter
> is defined by the authorization server. If the value c
Wasn't there some concensus that URIs would be good for scope? They
have "in-built namespacing" ...
Lukas
2010/6/23 Dick Hardt :
>
> On 2010-06-22, at 11:07 PM, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:
>
>> "
>> scope
>> OPTIONAL. The scope of the access request expressed as a list
>
iao
Hannes
> -Original Message-
> From: ext Lukas Rosenstock [mailto:l...@lukasrosenstock.net]
> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 10:49 AM
> To: Dick Hardt
> Cc: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo); OAuth WG
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Scope :: Was: Extensibility for OAuth?
>
I recall there being consensus on the space delimiter to make it so that
URIs could be used easily as scope parameters. I know that I,
personally, would rather have keywords in our implementation than URIs,
so I'm very much in favor of keeping it unspecified.
-- justin
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 03:4
iginal Message-
>> From: ext Lukas Rosenstock [mailto:l...@lukasrosenstock.net]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 10:49 AM
>> To: Dick Hardt
>> Cc: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo); OAuth WG
>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Scope :: Was: Extensibility for OAuth?
>>
etf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org]
> On Behalf Of Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 3:58 AM
> To: ext Lukas Rosenstock; Dick Hardt
> Cc: OAuth WG
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Scope :: Was: Extensibility for OAuth?
>
> The questio
To: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo); ext Lukas
> Rosenstock; Dick Hardt
> Cc: OAuth WG
> Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] Scope :: Was: Extensibility for OAuth?
>
> I'm in favor of having a spaces separated list of tokens.
> The only case I can think of where the client needs to han
in other cases, such as "std:".
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ext William Mills [mailto:wmi...@yahoo-inc.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 8:15 PM
> > To: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo); ext Lukas
>
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ext William Mills [mailto:wmi...@yahoo-inc.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 8:15 PM
>> To: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo); ext Lukas
>> Rosenstock; Dick Hardt
>> Cc: OAuth WG
>
hat are
> not allowed to be used in other cases, such as "std:".
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ext William Mills [mailto:wmi...@yahoo-inc.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 8:15 PM
>> To: Tschofenig, Hannes
t;> there would still be the need to decide about the structure of the values
>> now. One possibility is to just add a prefix for standardized values that
>> are not allowed to be used in other cases, such as "std:".
>>
>> Ciao
>> Hannes
>>
>>
would be "https://graph.facebook.com";.
>>>
>>> To respond to the statement Dick made about having standardized values
>>> later there would still be the need to decide about the structure of the
>>> values now. One possibility is to just add a pref
> Cc: OAuth WG
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Scope :: Was: Extensibility for OAuth?
>
> I agree with Dick that the scope should remain out of scope for OAuth.
> ;-) Having a shared parameter here gives the illusion of interoperability, but
> because there's no common understa
f Dick Hardt
> Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 8:50 AM
> To: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
> Cc: OAuth WG
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Scope :: Was: Extensibility for OAuth?
>
> To clarify, the goal is to reserve a namespace for future use so that near
> term
> imple
ck Hardt
>> Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 8:50 AM
>> To: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
>> Cc: OAuth WG
>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Scope :: Was: Extensibility for OAuth?
>>
>> To clarify, the goal is to reserve a namespace for future use so that near
>&g
That's coming in -09.
EHL
> -Original Message-
> From: Dick Hardt [mailto:dick.ha...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:19 AM
> To: Eran Hammer-Lahav
> Cc: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo); OAuth WG
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Scope :: Was: Extensibility
th-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
>> Of Dick Hardt
>> Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 8:50 AM
>> To: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
>> Cc: OAuth WG
>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Scope :: Was: Extensibility for OAuth?
>>
>> To clar
17 matches
Mail list logo