Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal: multiple access tokens from a single authorization flow

2010-06-17 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
ccess tokens from a single authorization flow Breno, > Alternative proposal. Create a new call for 'dropping privileges' where a client can present a single refresh token and scopes and obtain a new refresh token/access token with defined scopes provided that these scopes were

Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal: multiple access tokens from a single authorization flow

2010-06-16 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
, 2010 6:54 PM To: Breno Cc: OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org) Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal: multiple access tokens from a single authorization flow Breno, > Alternative proposal. Create a new call for 'dropping privileges' where a > client can present a single refresh token and scopes

Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal: multiple access tokens from a single authorization flow

2010-06-16 Thread Manger, James H
Breno, > Alternative proposal. Create a new call for 'dropping privileges' where a > client can present a single refresh token and scopes and obtain a new refresh > token/access token with defined scopes provided that these scopes were > already granted to the original token. > The advantage

Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal: multiple access tokens from a single authorization flow

2010-06-16 Thread Breno
>> >> >> EHL >> >> >> >> From: Breno [mailto:breno.demedei...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 8:17 AM >> To: Eran Hammer-Lahav >> Cc: Torsten Lodderstedt; OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org) >> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal: multipl

Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal: multiple access tokens from a single authorization flow

2010-06-16 Thread Justin Richer
> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 8:17 AM > To: Eran Hammer-Lahav > Cc: Torsten Lodderstedt; OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org) > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal: multiple access tokens from a single > authorization flow > > > > Alternative proposal. Create a new call for

Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal: multiple access tokens from a single authorization flow

2010-06-16 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
medei...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 8:17 AM To: Eran Hammer-Lahav Cc: Torsten Lodderstedt; OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org) Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal: multiple access tokens from a single authorization flow Alternative proposal. Create a new call for 'dropping privileges' wher

Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal: multiple access tokens from a single authorization flow

2010-06-16 Thread Breno
Alternative proposal. Create a new call for 'dropping privileges' where a client can present a single refresh token and scopes and obtain a new refresh token/access token with defined scopes provided that these scopes were already granted to the original token. The advantage of a separate call is

Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal: multiple access tokens from a single authorization flow

2010-06-11 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
t; > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On > >> Behalf Of David Recordon > >> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 8:54 AM > >> To: Torsten Lodderstedt > >> Cc: OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.

Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal: multiple access tokens from a single authorization flow

2010-06-11 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
) Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal: multiple access tokens from a single authorization flow I strongly believe that it should be an extension. Even optional response parameters increase the complexity for client developers and this in particular affects the data model used to store access tokens

Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal: multiple access tokens from a single authorization flow

2010-06-10 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
Of David Recordon > Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 8:54 AM > To: Torsten Lodderstedt > Cc: OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org) > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal: multiple access tokens from a single > authorization flow > > I strongly believe that it should be an extension. Even optional resp

Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal: multiple access tokens from a single authorization flow

2010-06-10 Thread Igor Faynberg
I thought I had already written this, but I guess the e-mail never went anywhere... I do have a strong opinion on Torsten's proposal, and it is POSITIVE. A nit pick: I would replace "Array" with "List," to read "A list of access tokens issued..." Igor Torsten Lodderstedt wrote: no one in

Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal: multiple access tokens from a single authorization flow

2010-06-10 Thread David Recordon
I strongly believe that it should be an extension. Even optional response parameters increase the complexity for client developers and this in particular affects the data model used to store access tokens. --David On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Torsten Lodderstedt wrote: > no one in the WG ha

Re: [OAUTH-WG] proposal: multiple access tokens from a single authorization flow

2010-06-10 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
no one in the WG having an opinion on this topic? Am 09.06.2010 12:19, schrieb Torsten Lodderstedt: Hi all, I would like to see support in OAuth2 for the authorization of arbitrary scopes in a single authorization flow for all kinds of deployments. In some deployments this may require to issu

[OAUTH-WG] proposal: multiple access tokens from a single authorization flow

2010-06-09 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
Hi all, I would like to see support in OAuth2 for the authorization of arbitrary scopes in a single authorization flow for all kinds of deployments. In some deployments this may require to issue multiple access tokens at once. Therefore, I would like to propose the following addition to secti