Re: [OAUTH-WG] the format parameter

2010-06-10 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
-WG] the format parameter Another alternative idea -- designate the 'format' param as an accept-header override. This technique has been successful for the X-Method-Override header and cements the Accept header syntax as the proper mechanism for selecting output format. On Thu, Jun 1

Re: [OAUTH-WG] the format parameter

2010-06-10 Thread Paul Lindner
Another alternative idea -- designate the 'format' param as an accept-header override. This technique has been successful for the X-Method-Override header and cements the Accept header syntax as the proper mechanism for selecting output format. On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Justin Richer wro

Re: [OAUTH-WG] the format parameter

2010-06-10 Thread Justin Richer
One of the things that I found particularly useful with working with OAuth1 was the ability to perform an entire transaction through URL parameter manipulation. This is why I wholly support keeping the client id and secret fields in the client auth flow and the username and password fields in the u

[OAUTH-WG] the format parameter

2010-06-10 Thread Marius Scurtescu
I am implementing an OAuth 2 library and the format parameter does not feel right. If a client is using a library then the response format should be totally transparent to the client. The library may have a setting if the client wants to force a format for whatever reason, but individual messages