Looks like I found a bug in regards to unmounts. Umount allows you to use
directory or device name to unmounts a file system. On at least the OEL6.3
server I am working on, umounting based on device name will lead to a message
says that the device is not mounted. This only happens with OCFS2 fil
: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 09:54
To: Mihail Daskalov
Cc: Sunil Mushran; Ulf Zimmermann; ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Problems with volumes coming from RHEL5 going to
OEL6 (slighly OT)
It's possible that the 1.8.0 tag was never created in the ocfs-tools git
repos
So far we only have OEL Network, but no support as we are still in the
investigation phase of switching to OEL from RHEL.
So no support yet that route.
From: Mihail Daskalov [mailto:mdaska...@technologica.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 07:55
To: Sunil Mushran; Ulf Zimmermann
Cc: ocfs2
ocfs\*
ocfs2-tools-1.8.0-10.el6.x86_64
Those tools are from the OEL install base.
[root@co-db03 ulf]# tunefs.ocfs2 -V
tunefs.ocfs2 1.8.0
[root@co-db03 ulf]# fsck.ocfs2 -V
fsck.ocfs2 1.8.0
From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:sunil.mush...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 16:11
To: Ulf Zimmermann
Sunil, any suggestions on this?
From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com
[mailto:ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Ulf Zimmermann
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 15:20
To: Sunil Mushran
Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Problems with volumes coming from
535
From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:sunil.mush...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 11:11
To: Ulf Zimmermann
Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Problems with volumes coming from RHEL5 going to OEL6
Can you dump the following using the 1.8 binary.
debugfs.ocfs2 -R "sta
We have a production cluster of 6 nodes, which are currently running RHEL 5.8
with OCFS2 1.4.10. We snapclone these volumes to multiple destinations, one of
them is a RHEL4 machine with OCFS2 1.2.9. Because of that the volumes are set
so that we can read them there.
We are now trying to bring u
To be move exact to the other replies:
You are trying to install 3 packages:
ocfs2-2.6.18-308.4.1.el5-1.4.10-1.el5.x86_64.rpm
ocfs2-2.6.18-308.4.1.el5debug-1.4.10-1.el5.x86_64.rpm
ocfs2-2.6.18-308.4.1.el5xen-1.4.10-1.el5.x86_64.rpm
The el5debug package is only needed if you are running the Debug
What is your kernel version? Run “uname –r”
My guess is that your kernel is not 2.6.18-238.9.1.el5 nor 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5
You will need to install the matching ocfs2-2.6.18-300.el5-1.4.9-1.el5.x86_64
package.
From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com
[mailto:ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com]
> Latest packages at oss.oracle.com is 308.8.1.el5, any plans to provide
> packages for 308.11.1.el5?
Never mind, there is OCFS2 1.4.10, which has the packages.
___
Ocfs2-users mailing list
Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/lis
Latest packages at oss.oracle.com is 308.8.1.el5, any plans to provide packages
for 308.11.1.el5?
Ulf.
___
Ocfs2-users mailing list
Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
> -Original Message-
> From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:sunil.mush...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 9:27 AM
> To: Ulf Zimmermann
> Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Problem with tunefs.ocfs2, similar to fsck.ocfs2 on
> EL5
>
- -Original Message-
> From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:sunil.mush...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 10:09 AM
> To: Ulf Zimmermann
> Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Problem with tunefs.ocfs2, similar to fsck.ocfs2 on
> EL5
>
>
ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com [mailto:ocfs2-users-
> boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Ulf Zimmermann
> Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 1:43 AM
> To: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: [Ocfs2-users] Problem with tunefs.ocfs2, similar to fsck.ocfs2 on EL5
>
> We are
We are running into a problem which looks like the same we had with fsck.ocfs2
a while back. This is with ocfs2-tools 1.4.4. I am trying to use tunefs.ocfs2
to turn off some features. The program starts up but then starts eating all
available memory and more and the system starts to swap like cr
Sunil, I was trying to see what the speed difference would be if I mount a
volume with no heartbeat (for copy purpose):
dbtest01 root /home/ulf # mount -o datavolume,nointr,heartbeat=none
/dev/mapper/350002ac001380dab /export/coptest/
dbtest01 root /home/ulf # mount
/dev/mapper/350002ac001380dab
I need to copy a number of volumes from one SAN to another SAN. Most of our
volumes are snapclone based, so moving those has been easy. But we got several
700GB volumes, which I can't move that way. Doing an umount/mount local (no
network lock?) doesn't seem help, speed is only about 20MB/sec us
While you run it, what is the memory usage? Is the system going into swap?
Our 700GB large volume would take over half a day or more to finish, due to the
system constantly having to swap.
From: Sergey Prilutsky [mailto:sprilut...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 5:22 AM
To: Ulf
If you are using ocfs2-tools-1.4.4, there is a bug with memory usage. Sunil
provided me a patched version, which is afik still not in the downloadable
tools version.
From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com
[mailto:ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Sergey Prilutsky
Sent: Tuesday
rch 11, 2011 8:31 PM
> To: Sunil Mushran; Ulf Zimmermann
> Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: RE: [Ocfs2-users] What could cause slow down betwen OCFS2 1.2.9
> and 1.4.4
>
> May I ask how you change these parameter ?
>
> Also, for a 90 percent read ocfs2, shoul
Another change we found is we used scheduler deadline, we are doing downtime
tonight to change scheduler and journal mode.
Ulf Zimmermann | Senior System Architect
OPENLANE, Inc | 2200 Bridge Parkway, Suite 202
Redwood City, CA 94065 | (650) 412-4042
u...@openlane.com
On Mar 11, 2011, at 14
We upgraded our production database cluster (6 node) from EL4 Update 5 to EL5
Update 5, including upgrading OCFS2 from 1.2.9 to 1.4.4.
We are now noticing slowdown of batch jobs in Oracle, while hotbackup runs
faster. One thing we saw is that journal mode changed from write-back to
ordered, as
> -Original Message-
> From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com [mailto:ocfs2-users-
> boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Joel Becker
> Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 2:54 PM
> To: brad hancock
> Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Reservation conflicts
>
> On
> -Original Message-
> From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com [mailto:ocfs2-users-
> boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Sunil Mushran
> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 9:57 AM
> To: Dag Wieers
> Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] new release 1.4.8.1
>
> On 12/
Then you haven't cloned the volume, but it is the same, would be my guess.
From: brad hancock [mailto:braddhanc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 1:54 PM
To: Ulf Zimmermann
Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] heartbeat and slot issues.
Thanks fo
After the clone, you want to probably run tunefs.ocfs2 -U to reset the UUID.
This is one of the steps we do when cloning volumes for database refreshes.
From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com
[mailto:ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of brad hancock
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2
As Sunil already wrote: iSCSI, FC attached SAN, Firewire (not really
recommended for production).
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexander Nagel [mailto:alexan...@acwn.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 12:44 PM
> To: Ulf Zimmermann
> Cc: Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> S
OCFS2 requires shared storage. Is /dev/sdb a shared device?
> -Original Message-
> From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com [mailto:ocfs2-users-
> boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Alexander Nagel
> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 12:03 PM
> To: Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: [Oc
Make sure you don't have deleted files, which are still open. You can use lsof
to find those.
From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com
[mailto:ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Garcia, Raymundo
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 11:18 PM
To: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-us
> -Original Message-
> From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com [mailto:ocfs2-users-
> boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of David Johle
> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 10:37 AM
> To: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: [Ocfs2-users] Why OCFS2 with RAC
>
> I have been a user of OCFS2 for
We have been running the -55 kernel for a long time on our Oracle servers,
there is one issue for us known, which is a memory leak in the kernel in
conjunction with HP management agents, but otherwise -55 has been ok for us.
But there have been plenty of fixes in newer kernels, but also traps. W
Sunil, Tao,
Can you tell me an estimation when a new tools package with this patch will be
available, I will have to give an answer to people and weigh if I want to build
an own version or wait for the package from you guys.
Ulf.
___
Ocfs2-users mai
> -Original Message-
> From: Joel Becker [mailto:joel.bec...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 6:31 PM
> To: Ulf Zimmermann
> Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] fsck.ocfs2 using huge amount of memory?
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2010
> -Original Message-
> From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com [mailto:ocfs2-users-
> boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Ulf Zimmermann
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 6:37 PM
> To: 'Joel Becker'
> Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-user
Bug 1255
> -Original Message-
> From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:sunil.mush...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 6:30 PM
> To: Ulf Zimmermann
> Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] fsck.ocfs2 using huge amount of memory?
>
> http:/
ocfs2
> -Original Message-
> From: Ulf Zimmermann
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 6:06 PM
> To: Ulf Zimmermann; ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: RE: fsck.ocfs2 using huge amount of memory?
>
> Correction, kernel module
Correction, kernel modules are 1.4.4, the tools and console is 1.4.3.
> -Original Message-
> From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com [mailto:ocfs2-users-
> boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Ulf Zimmermann
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 6:00 PM
> To: ocfs2-users
We are setting up 2 new EL5 U4 machines to replace our current database servers
running our demo environment. We use 3Par SANs and their snap clone options.
The current production system we snap clone from is EL4 U5 with ocfs2 1.2.9,
the new servers have ocfs2 1.4.3 installed. Part of the refre
OCFS needs shared storage, your /dev/sda sounds like local storage, not shared.
From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com
[mailto:ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of v...@ghs.l.google.com
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 11:16 AM
To: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-users] OC
Oh the joy that is SAP ... I love how you have to have a shared file system
from SAP application server to the database server. As far I know it is to put
their scripts/binaries for database maintenance (like backup) on the App
Server. I think it is a terrible hack. (I got similar thoughts about
On our 3Par SAN we use O2CB_HEARTBEAT_THRESHOLD of 76 (180 seconds). This is
the time needed for the controller to fully recover in case of a crash or
software upgrade. Multipath is configured with a polling_interval of 10,
no_path_retry of 60. With these settings we are able to survive SAN swit
> -Original Message-
>
> Questions:
> Can we set up redundant heartbeat ip connections? Can we also add a
> disk heartbeat? If it truly is network connectivity, can we set the
> timeout to be more lenient? And can we change the fencing to something
> other than machine reset? Eg unmount
For backup/restore the doubt is the same. We can restore
> ocfs
> > backup to an ocfs2, could we also restore ocfs2 backup to an ocfs
> volume?
> >
> > Thanx a lot
Ulf Zimmermann | Senior System Architect
OPENLANE
4600 Bohannon Drive, Suite 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025
O: 650
>
> Thanks a lot
> Corne
>
Ulf Zimmermann | Senior System Architect
OPENLANE
4600 Bohannon Drive, Suite 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025
O: 650-532-6382 M: (510) 396-1764 F: (510) 580-0929
Email: u...@openlane.com | Web: www.openlane.com
_
Look at device-mapper-multipath
Regards, Ulf.
-
OPENLANE Inc., T: 650-532-6382, F: 650-532-6441
4600 Bohannon Drive, Suite 100, Menlo Park, CA 94025
-
> -Or
> -Original Message-
> From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com [mailto:ocfs2-users-
> boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of James Pifer
> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 10:34 AM
> To: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: [Ocfs2-users] second ocfs2 volume
>
> I've been using a 300GB ocf
Isn't your problem that you are setting the filesystem type to "ocfs2_oracw"
and "ocfs2_oragrid" ? Unless this has changed after 1.2.9, it should be "ocfs2".
From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com
[mailto:ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of McKinley, Reid
Sent: Thursday, August 0
> From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com
> [mailto:ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Sun
> Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 10:40 PM
> To: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: [Ocfs2-users] Q: install ocfs2 on SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 9 SP4
>
> Hello! everybody here!
>
> From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com
> [mailto:ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Keisling
> Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 1:22 PM
> To: Bumpass, Brian; ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] OCFS2 FS with BACKUP Tools/Vendors
>
> I use HP Data Protecto
> -Original Message-
> From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com [mailto:ocfs2-users-
> boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Masaryk Kevin D
> Sent: 02/24/2009 13:21
> To: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: [Ocfs2-users] mounting mpath devices
>
> I'm seeing some strange behavior from OC
> -Original Message-
> From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com [mailto:ocfs2-users-
> boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Schneider
> Sent: 02/06/2009 11:19
> To: Sunil Mushran
> Cc: oracl...@freelists.org; ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] future of ocfs2
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com [mailto:ocfs2-users-
> boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Pedro Figueira
> Sent: 02/03/2009 09:07
> To: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Cc: Ricardo Rocha Ramalho; Pedro Lopes Almeida
> Subject: [Ocfs2-users] strange node reboot
> -Original Message-
> From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com [mailto:ocfs2-users-
> boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of David Johle
> Sent: 01/28/2009 10:12
> To: jmose...@corp.xanadoo.com
> Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] ocfs2 hangs during webserver usage
>
C nodes again
Recover database from logs and modify name to the development name
At this point after other script run to modify contents in the database
(email addresses, phone numbers, etc)
And voila database is ready for use by developers.
Ulf Zimmermann | Senior System Architect
OPENLANE
4600 Bohannon
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ocfs2-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Petri Asikainen
> Sent: 11/26/2008 11:57
> To: Sunil Mushran
> Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Generic question about cluster
communication
> (with user mode hear
magic number in superblock while opening device
> /dev/loop0)
> i tried to format on each server and then mount again with works
> but it then i don't see
> changes i make in /cawww on the other servers.
> it seems that each server isn't aware of the other servers.
&
I am looking at upgrading from the RHEL4U5 kernel set to U6 or beyond.
Updates has 2.6.9-67.0.20, oss site only has rpms for up to
2.6.9-67.0.15. Any ETA for .20 modules?
Ulf Zimmermann | Senior System Architect
OPENLANE
4600 Bohannon Drive, Suite 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025
O: 650-532-6382 M
turning one off. We also had an Ethernet port in a machine
itself fail and it used the second port almost immediately.
Ulf Zimmermann | Senior System Architect
OPENLANE
4600 Bohannon Drive, Suite 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025
O: 650-532-6382 M: (510) 396-1764 F: (510) 580-0929
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED
age-
> From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 15:49
> To: Ulf Zimmermann
> Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] OCFS2 and Cloning
>
> While fsck.ocfs2 replays the journals, it does not clean the orphan
> dir
I am working currently on cloning on a regular basis our production
OCFS2 volumes to our test environment. For the database (Oracle 10G R2
RAC) we put it into backup mode, then execute a Snapclone on our 3Par
SAN. Then we use RemoteCopy and SnapClone to our development 3Par SAN.
To recover the OCF
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 01:43
> To: Ulf Zimmermann
> Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: RE: [Ocfs2-users] Anyone have an idea how to find file
> i/othroughput?
>
> Ulf,
>
> Have you considered using systemtap? There is a recipe here that
could
>
; From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 19:28
> To: Ulf Zimmermann
> Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Anyone have an idea how to find file i/o
> throughput?
>
> If a userspace process is behind the io surge, the
We got a remote Oracle 10g R2 standby running on OCFS2. Initial when we
started the standby, read I/O was < 5MB/sec on average. Since then it
has grown to over 40MB/sec (longer average, it peaks much higher). Here
is a graph showing this:
http://www.alameda.net/~ulf/dbphx01.png
We also have a loc
.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 1:07 PM
> To: Ulf Zimmermann
> Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] OCFS2 DLM problems
>
> Depends on the net traffic I guess. The error ret
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 9:58 AM
To: Ulf Zimmermann
Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] OCFS2 DLM problems
1.2.5-what?
If you are not on 1.2.5-6, upgrade to that. It could be you are hitting
the
following issue addressed in that release.
r3033 tcp
quot; on dbprd02
and "dlm_send_proxy_ast_msg", "dlm_flush_asts" on dbprd01.
We are currently running OCFS2 1.2.5, the kernel is EL4 Update 5 x86_64
(2.6.9-55.ELsmp).
I see there is one bug fixed in 1.2.6/1.2.7 related to DLM and I was
wondering if the above problem could be related to it
You need shared storage to use OCFS, not local storage on each server.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ocfs2-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Benjamin Smith
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 18:00
> To: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: [Ocfs2-users] Mi
You have Oracle people telling us not to use bonding.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 15:28
> To: Ulf Zimmermann
> Cc: Randy Ramsdell; ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Cluster
007 15:13
> To: Ulf Zimmermann
> Cc: Randy Ramsdell; ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Cluster setup
>
> Use network bonding.
>
> Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ocfs2-users-
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ocfs2-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexei_Roudnev
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 11:10
> To: Sunil Mushran; Randy Ramsdell
> Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Cluster setup
>
> I explained you:
age-
> From: Hagmann, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 23:47
> To: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Cc: Ulf Zimmermann; Sunil Mushran
> Subject: RE: [Ocfs2-users] 6 node cluster with unexplained reboots
>
> Hi
>
> I have the same situat
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Fasheh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 16:49
> To: Ulf Zimmermann
> Cc: Sunil Mushran; ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] 6 node cluster with unexplained reboots
>
> On Mon, Au
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Fasheh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 18:12
> To: Ulf Zimmermann
> Cc: Sunil Mushran; ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] 6 node cluster with unexplained reboots
>
> On Wed, Au
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Fasheh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 18:04
> To: Alexei_Roudnev
> Cc: Ulf Zimmermann; Sunil Mushran; ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] 6 node cluster with unexplained reboots
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Fasheh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 17:50
> To: Ulf Zimmermann
> Cc: Sunil Mushran; ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] 6 node cluster with unexplained reboots
>
> On Wed, Au
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Fasheh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 16:49
> To: Ulf Zimmermann
> Cc: Sunil Mushran; ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] 6 node cluster with unexplained reboots
>
> On Mon, Au
***
There were no SCSI errors on the console or logs around the time of this
reboot.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ocfs2-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ulf Zimmermann
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 11:11
> To: Sunil Mushran
> Cc: ocfs2-us
Too early to call. Management made the call "This hardware seems to have
been stable, lets use it".
> -Original Message-
> From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 11:07
> To: Ulf Zimmermann
> Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
>
age-
> From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 10:21
> To: Ulf Zimmermann
> Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] 6 node cluster with unexplained reboots
>
> Do you have a netconsole setup? If not, set it up. That
We just installed a new cluster with 6 HP DL380g5, dual single port Qlogic 24xx
HBAs connected via two HP 4/16 Storageworks switches to a 3Par S400. We are
using the 3Par recommended config for the Qlogic driver and
device-mapper-multipath giving us 4 paths to the SAN. We do see some SCSI
error
C -i -n dbcl1n5 -t node -a number=4 -a
ip_address=192.168.201.5
> -a
> ip_port= -a cluster=dbcl1
>
> on all nodes. It automaticaly updates cluster.conf e add on-the-fly
the
> nodes.
>
> Check faq and make sure you understand all command line options.
>
> Rgds
>
I looked around, found older post which seems not applicable anymore. I
have a cluster of 2 nodes right now, which has 3 OCFS2 file systems. All
the file systems were formatted with 4 node slots. I added the two news
nodes (by hand, by ocfs2console and o2cb_ctl), so my
/etc/ofcfs/cluster.conf looks
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ocfs2-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sunil Mushran
> Sent: 05/07/2007 10:47
> To: Alexei_Roudnev
> Cc: Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Hi
>
> None of what you have written allows you to use our resourc
> -Original Message-
> From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04/25/2007 12:16
> To: Ulf Zimmermann
> Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Some questions about ocfs2
>
> What's the blocksize?
Block Size Bits: 12 Cl
> -Original Message-
> From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04/25/2007 10:31
> To: Ulf Zimmermann
> Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Some questions about ocfs2
>
> # debugfs.ocfs2 -R "stats -h" /dev/sdy2 | g
Is there a way to see how a file system was formatted, i.e. the block
size and cluster size? I currently have a 2TB file system, of which
about 840GB are in use by around 9 million image files. Average size of
these images is 60-100KB. Currently our production servers still have
separate file syste
86 matches
Mail list logo
