Re: [OctDev] Octave-3.4.2-mingw + octaveforge pkgs

2011-09-06 Thread Nit Nit
Hello Octaveforge developers and users, I have updated the installed octaveforge pkgs: Octave3.4.2_gcc4.5.2_pkgs_20110907.7z http://www.multiupload.com/N0UY6Z2EEL Changes (changes and readme txt files included in 7z archive): updated - windows-1.1.0 version update updated - java-1.2.8 s

Re: [OctDev] Java jslider callback fails on windows

2011-09-06 Thread Michael Goffioul
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Nit Nit wrote: > Hi Michael, > Copying the x32 pkg files didn't help. The only solution which helped was to > install JRE for x32 on my Win7-x64 machine. That makes sense, as the rest of octave is for x32. Not sure x32-compiled JNI components can be used as-is with

Re: [OctDev] differences with matlab in control package

2011-09-06 Thread Jordi Burguet Castell
Hi Lukas, 2011/9/6 Lukas Reichlin : > On 06.09.2011, at 14:58, Jordi Burguet Castell wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> There are a few differences from matlab in the behavior of the control >> package, that bite me when running some codes. I don't know if they >> exist by design or it would be nice to make th

Re: [OctDev] differences with matlab in control package

2011-09-06 Thread Jordi Burguet Castell
Good to know, thanks! :) Jordi 2011/9/6 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso : > Hola. :-) > > On 6 September 2011 07:58, Jordi Burguet Castell > wrote: >> There are a few differences from matlab in the behavior of the control >> package, that bite me when running some codes. I don't know if they >> exist by

Re: [OctDev] ODS (OpenOffice.org Calc) read support added to IO package

2011-09-06 Thread Philip Nienhuis
Hi Jacques, Jacques Malaprade wrote: > Hi Philip, > >> But... why do you have two odfdom.jar versions in the javaclasspath? >> > > I have tried both versions on their own, but is still does not work. > Which one should I keep do you think? Doesn't matter much which one. It may be helpful to down

Re: [OctDev] Java jslider callback fails on windows

2011-09-06 Thread Nit Nit
Hi Michael, Copying the x32 pkg files didn't help. The only solution which helped was to install JRE for x32 on my Win7-x64 machine. Thanks for your help. BTW will you update the Makefile in the SVN with the '-Wl,--kill-at' flag ? I assume that it is required for mingw but I don't know whether i

Re: [OctDev] differences with matlab in control package

2011-09-06 Thread Lukas Reichlin
On 06.09.2011, at 16:20, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > Hola. :-) > > On 6 September 2011 07:58, Jordi Burguet Castell > wrote: >> There are a few differences from matlab in the behavior of the control >> package, that bite me when running some codes. I don't know if they >> exist by design or

Re: [OctDev] differences with matlab in control package

2011-09-06 Thread Lukas Reichlin
On 06.09.2011, at 14:58, Jordi Burguet Castell wrote: > Hi, > > There are a few differences from matlab in the behavior of the control > package, that bite me when running some codes. I don't know if they > exist by design or it would be nice to make them disappear. For > example, > * There is no

Re: [OctDev] differences with matlab in control package

2011-09-06 Thread Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
Hola. :-) On 6 September 2011 07:58, Jordi Burguet Castell wrote: > There are a few differences from matlab in the behavior of the control > package, that bite me when running some codes. I don't know if they > exist by design or it would be nice to make them disappear. Almost always, difference

[OctDev] differences with matlab in control package

2011-09-06 Thread Jordi Burguet Castell
Hi, There are a few differences from matlab in the behavior of the control package, that bite me when running some codes. I don't know if they exist by design or it would be nice to make them disappear. For example, * There is no "zpf" function. Instead, there is "zp", which appears to do the same

Re: [OctDev] ODS (OpenOffice.org Calc) read support added to IO package

2011-09-06 Thread Jacques Malaprade
Hi Philip, > But... why do you have two odfdom.jar versions in the javaclasspath? > I have tried both versions on their own, but is still does not work. Which one should I keep do you think? > The cure is to replace the statement >if (isunix) tmp1 = strsplit (tmp1, ":"); endif > with >