Quoting Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Eh, I'm thinking more of:
> 1) Maintainer commits a "Release PACKAGE" message, with PACKAGE the
> package's name. A commit hook in the version control system checks each
> commit message for such a phrase and triggers a package build *on the
> server* and
Moving this to Octave-Forge mailing list from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I don't intend to add any more octave-forge packages to Debian until
> octave-forge's release process is fixed (and yes, it currently is
> broken).
>
> By "fixed" I mean that:
> 1) Packages
s
errors, which is one of the reasons why I'm screwing up. But in the
end, the fault is mine...
Søren
Quoting Tatsuro MATSUOKA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello Soren
>
> In addtion of missing triangular-1.0.4.tar.gz, the package,
> data-smoothing and octgpr packages did not
&g
Hmm, the package doesn't seem to build on my machine at work. It seems
to me that the SWIG generated packages have been giving some problems,
so if you plan on distributing cygwin binaries, I'd recommend to skip
this package for now. When I get home tonight, I'll see if the package
builds t
Quoting David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Now that this octave-forge release is done, should we target future
> octave-forge release for the 3.1.x/3.2.x tree? If so can I commit
> the patch that moves the quaternions, control, and ?? toolboxes into
> octave-forge. There are also several ot
Quoting Jonathan Stickel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am rewriting the functions in the data-smoothing package. The code is
> done and bug-checked as best I could. I just need to rewrite the help
> and demos. If you could give me until the end of the week, that would
> be great.
That's fine by me.
uess?), so expect a new Octave-Forge release in about ten days.
Tatsuro, is that okay with you?
Søren
Quoting Tatsuro MATSUOKA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello Soren
>
> *
> Jaroslav Hajek-2 Aug 05, 2008; 05:00pm :: Rate this Message:(use
> ratings to moderate[?]
I got a mail yesterday from Source Forge that mentioned that the SVN
would be down on July 30th for a maximum of 12 hours. I can never
figure out dates across time zones, so it is possible that the SVN is
supposed to be down at the moment. Try again later, and if the problem
persists, repor
Hi,
It's great to see somebody pick up my work, and try to finish it. Thank you.
(answers below)
Quoting "Thomas L. Scofield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> First off, the existing bwdist.m works for 1 and 2D arrays (since,
> apparently, an n-vector is seen by ndims as having 2 dimensions, so
> j
Quoting Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Otherwise, could you please point me to where the "automatic promotion" you
> mention above is documented?
I had a quick look online, but couldn't really find any explaination
that fits well into this situation. What I said is just my
understan
Quoting Alois Schlögl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Nowawdays, I'm using "GPL v3 or later". Is there any specific reason not
> to move to GPL v3 ?
Since Octave is GPL v3 now, I don't see any reason not to use that
license. It's also what's recommended on the Octave-Forge website.
Søren
-
Hi All,
I'll make the next release tomorrow night Danish time (that's
GMT+1). So, if you have a change that you want to get in before the
release, now is the time to upload it. If the timing is bad for you,
please let me know.
Søren
--
Quoting Jaroslav Hajek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Concerning readability - even if the name chol2logdet is kind of
> self-describing, I'd still want to stop and look up what it actually
> does,
> so it would probably slow down reading - on the contrary, the inline
> formula should probably be commented
Quoting Jaroslav Hajek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> This is actually useful if you want to compute both log det and the
>> inverse of Q since then you only need to call chol once. For example,
>>
>> R = chol(Q);
>> d = chol2logdet(R);
>> Qinv = chol2inv(R);
>>
>
> I know that it's useful, I'm just
14 matches
Mail list logo
