As I have been guilty of needing a jab in the ribs
like this in the past...That's enough bickering.
Amongst the attitude/responsibility checking that has
gone on in this thread there are only two questions
that require responses.
1) Can we/is it necessary to determine a better plan
of action for
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-333?page=comments#action_12446451 ]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-333:
--
Si: based on feedback on the list it sounds like people like the idea of
putting it in the controller.xml file, so I'd
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-366?page=comments#action_12446450 ]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-366:
---
Iain,
I'm very happy to count you with us. I look forward for patches or comments
from you part.
Thanks
> Separate
From: "Adam Heath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Si Chen wrote:
> > I don't know about the particulars of the commons-fileupload library,
> > but the problem with the bsf is that it interfered with the currently
> > used jpublish. If you can supply an upgrade combination of bsf and
> > jpublish that still
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-423?page=comments#action_12446445 ]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-423:
--
This is in the order stuff and not the invoice stuff. It was also something
that was written a long time ago as a compr
On Nov 1, 2006, at 3:48 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Si,
Adam was a big contributor before you came along. At the time he
was considered a "trusted" source.
Yes and no. From where I'm sitting I'd say Si has done and continues
to do far more for OFBiz and every user of OFBiz than Adam or anyone
On Nov 1, 2006, at 3:00 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Si Chen wrote:
I don't know about the particulars of the commons-fileupload library,
but the problem with the bsf is that it interfered with the currently
used jpublish. If you can supply an upgrade combination of bsf and
jpublish that still works
The body of this message still said "TS3"... sorry about that. This
was for TS5 as the subject line specified.
-David
On Nov 1, 2006, at 9:04 PM, David E Jones wrote:
The community vote has approved the 4.0.0 TS3 test snapshot release.
The actual results are:
Binding:
+1: 5 (Jacopo, D
The community vote has approved the 4.0.0 TS3 test snapshot release.
The actual results are:
Binding:
+1: 5 (Jacopo, David J., David W., Jacques, Yoav)
+0: 0
-1: 0
Non-binding:
+1: 4 (Marco Risaliti, Alex Fleming, Ashish Vijaywargiya, Anil Patel)
+0: 0
-1: 0
This is a success as 3 bindi
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-366?page=comments#action_12446418 ]
Iain Fogg commented on OFBIZ-366:
-
Please count me in for work in this area.
> Separate VAT from Sales Tax
> ---
>
> Key: OF
Invoice pro-rates adjustments
-
Key: OFBIZ-423
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-423
Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project)
Issue Type: Bug
Components: accounting
Report
Si,
I'll raise a jira issue.
Cheers, Iain
Si Chen wrote:
This has not been implemented yet.
On Oct 31, 2006, at 10:00 PM, Iain Fogg wrote:
Hi all,
Scenario (from the book trade):
1. I create an order for products X, Y, and Z from suppler BigSupplier
2. Products arrive from BigSupplier and
Supplier returns
Key: OFBIZ-422
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-422
Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project)
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: accounting, product
Reporter: Iain
I wasn't suggesting that he was not, and I am aware that he was a
contributor before. As this is a public list, I was hoping to
explain why (at least from my perspective) sometimes patches aren't
applied.
On Nov 1, 2006, at 2:48 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Si,
Adam was a big contributor befo
Si,
Adam was a big contributor before you came along. At the time he was considered
a "trusted" source.
Si Chen wrote:
Adam,
If there were some older patches that got missed two years ago, maybe
it's good to submit them again. We do have more committers back then.
As to the general qu
Adam,
If there were some older patches that got missed two years ago, maybe
it's good to submit them again. We do have more committers back then.
As to the general question of why patches don't get applied "by those
in charge," obviously we could all work harder for the good of the
proje
Si Chen wrote:
> I don't know about the particulars of the commons-fileupload library,
> but the problem with the bsf is that it interfered with the currently
> used jpublish. If you can supply an upgrade combination of bsf and
> jpublish that still works, I think that should work for me (and
> ho
Yes at root (controller ) seems easier for a beginning.
Service definition of type "service-multi" seems a good idea to me.
Jacques
> Adding it to the controller would be enough for now.
> For the future we could maybe consider to wrap the service in a new
> service definition of type "service-m
Hi Alex,
Please see here :
http://ofbizwiki.go-integral.com/Wiki.jsp?page=OFBizInNetBeans5.0
Jacques
- Original Message -
From: "Alex D. Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ofbiz Developer"
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 8:04 PM
Subject: Steps to setup Ofbiz on Netbeans
> Hi Jacop
I actually had to compile the org.apache.bsf from apache SVN to get the
latest SVN to compile.
had to replace the import com.ibm.bsf with the import org.apache.bsf
Adam Heath sent the following on 11/1/2006 12:52 PM:
Recently, I filed a bug(OFBIZ-401), to update bsf.jar to something more
modern
I don't know about the particulars of the commons-fileupload library,
but the problem with the bsf is that it interfered with the currently
used jpublish. If you can supply an upgrade combination of bsf and
jpublish that still works, I think that should work for me (and
hopefully the other
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-421?page=comments#action_12446380 ]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-421:
---
I like it too.
> Add new link Relation(Reln) on the Entity Data Maintenance Screen
>
We're tied up in production and missed this on the lists. Brainfood will not
be able to attend. I recommend sending direct email announcements to
companies with featured solutions in the future. I think it will improve the
quality of feedback at the conference.
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 22:49,
Recently, I filed a bug(OFBIZ-401), to update bsf.jar to something more
modern. This was backed out, as ofbiz makes use of an ancient jpublish
that also uses the older bsf.
Just recently, I had another case occur, with an old library.
commons-fileupload is also very old, and the current version h
Adding it to the controller would be enough for now.
For the future we could maybe consider to wrap the service in a new
service definition of type "service-multi" and add the transaction
properties there.
Jacopo
David E Jones wrote:
We need some feedback on a design issue.
The question i
I'd have to call in, since I'm not going to be there physically and
would like to be involved in a community call.
On Nov 1, 2006, at 11:20 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
My vote would be to have the call in number if people can bear it -
and yes it will echo unfortunately - but for some people that
There is no hard and fast rule about which to use.
However, I see the primary benefit of a subelement as
being learning curve. As needs arise to expand the
event definition further utilizing a subelement for
this will make the definition less ambiguous what each
attribute is referring to.
The
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-420?page=comments#action_12446360 ]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-420:
--
Hi Jacopo
Looks good, all the pages are loading correctly.
Thanks for the quick commits
Regards
Scott
> Convert shark to scr
My vote would be to have the call in number if people can bear it - and
yes it will echo unfortunately - but for some people that would be
better than nothing.
I also think that we should elicit topics beforehand - that'll get
people a rollin'.
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http:/
On Nov 1, 2006, at 12:06 PM, Chris Howe wrote:
I would prefer in the controller.xml as a subelement
(as opposed to attribute) to the tag as
additional config parameters may be beneficial in the
future.
That is what attributes are good for... subelements involve more
overhead in the schema,
I would prefer in the controller.xml as a subelement
(as opposed to attribute) to the tag as
additional config parameters may be beneficial in the
future.
Putting it at the service definition would limit it's
flexibility.
--- David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> We need some feedback o
Hi Jacopo,
I noticed in the mailing list that you are using NetBeans with ofbiz.
I searched mailing list to setup ofbiz with NB but the details are for old
contents and I got confused when I read the details from old wiki.
Can you please provide some short and sweet steps to make the ofbiz as a N
I'm a little bit concerned about a phone call because the room we are
in is fairly large with high ceilings and a hardwood floor, meaning
there is a tendency to echo a bit and I don't know how well a speaker
phone will work.
We could certainly give it a try (might be nice for future
ref
I am having trouble getting my messages posted to the list. This one
is taking a long time and I wonder if it is because it has HTML in the
content and an attachment. I am pasting it in plain test.
...
One of the presentations at the Users Conference will be me talking on
my experiences with Grind
We would just all call in to 218.936.6660 - pick option 2 - then enter
the code 632491.
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
Si Chen wrote:
So how do we set this up? Do we just call that number or go to a
website?
On Nov 1, 2006,
We need some feedback on a design issue.
The question is where to put the configuration option for specifying
whether or not to wrap the multiple service calls from the service-
multi event handler in a single transaction.
Where would people prefer to configure this option? The two main
p
So how do we set this up? Do we just call that number or go to a
website?
On Nov 1, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
I often use a free conference call line that works really well if
we want to try it. I think the phone number is 218.936.6660 - you
create it and enter the extension f
I often use a free conference call line that works really well if we
want to try it. I think the phone number is 218.936.6660 - you create it
and enter the extension for your call.
Check it out - it might be a good fit on such short notice. May I
suggest a passcode of 632491 (OFBIZ!) :)
Che
Al,
Can I suggest, for your 3 - 5 PM slot on Friday (or whatever openings):
1. A presentation on how content management works? I understand how
the Websites and Surveys work, but my knowledge of how the content
manager really works is limited to ProductContentWrapper and to
generating XM
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-421?page=comments#action_12446322 ]
Si Chen commented on OFBIZ-421:
---
Ok, this sounds fine to me. Is everybody else ok with it? If so I'll commit
it.
Thanks for the screenshot Ashish--a picture really
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-333?page=comments#action_12446323 ]
Si Chen commented on OFBIZ-333:
---
Hmm...just you and me on this one, it seems. Well, are you ok enough with it
to put it in?
> ServiceMultiEventHandler to support co
On Nov 1, 2006, at 1:16 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Yes it renders the primary content record (for the moment french).
I will fix it (put english by default) when I will return from
vacation, in one week.
So there is no bug to worry for.
Great, thanks for the clarification and such Jacques.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-421?page=all ]
Ashish Vijaywargiya updated OFBIZ-421:
--
Attachment: Relation_Link.png
Si,
Thanks for taking interest in my patch.
Actually it is same as the View Relation link.
But I also provided this li
Thanks for working on this Jacopo, it looks good.
-David
On Nov 1, 2006, at 3:44 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
David,
thanks for your help; I've implemented them in rev. 469851
Jacopo
David E Jones wrote:
Jacopo,
Yes, this makes sense. Just get and show all messages. You might
want to f
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-421?page=comments#action_12446305 ]
Si Chen commented on OFBIZ-421:
---
Hi. How is this different than the [View Relations] link that already exists?
Would you mind attaching a screenshot?
> Add new lin
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-421?page=all ]
Si Chen reassigned OFBIZ-421:
-
Assignee: Si Chen
> Add new link Relation(Reln) on the Entity Data Maintenance Screen
> -
>
>
This has not been implemented yet.
On Oct 31, 2006, at 10:00 PM, Iain Fogg wrote:
Hi all,
Scenario (from the book trade):
1. I create an order for products X, Y, and Z from suppler BigSupplier
2. Products arrive from BigSupplier and are received into inventory
3. 6 months later, some of the p
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-420?page=all ]
Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-420.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Scott,
that's great, thanks.
Your patch is in rev. 469915: could you please have a look to see if I've
missed anything?
Thanks
> Conv
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-414?page=all ]
Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-414.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Scott, your patch is in rev. 469914
> Shark build.xml needs updating
> --
>
> Key: OF
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-414?page=all ]
Jacopo Cappellato reassigned OFBIZ-414:
---
Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato
> Shark build.xml needs updating
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-414
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-420?page=all ]
Jacopo Cappellato reassigned OFBIZ-420:
---
Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato
> Convert shark to screen widgets
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-420
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-318?page=all ]
Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-318.
---
Resolution: Fixed
This is now implemented in rev. 469879 by refactoring the
receiveInventoryProduct from group service to minilang.
See the commit logs fo
David,
thanks for your help; I've implemented them in rev. 469851
Jacopo
David E Jones wrote:
Jacopo,
Yes, this makes sense. Just get and show all messages. You might want to
filter out duplicate messages, ie the same as another message already in
the list.
BTW, a success message could b
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-421?page=all ]
Ashish Vijaywargiya updated OFBIZ-421:
--
Attachment: Add_Relation_Link.patch.zip
> Add new link Relation(Reln) on the Entity Data Maintenance Screen
> ---
Add new link Relation(Reln) on the Entity Data Maintenance Screen
-
Key: OFBIZ-421
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-421
Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-420?page=all ]
Scott Gray updated OFBIZ-420:
-
Attachment: patch.txt
> Convert shark to screen widgets
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-420
> URL: http://issues.apach
Convert shark to screen widgets
---
Key: OFBIZ-420
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-420
Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project)
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: framework
Aff
On Nov 1, 2006, at 2:30 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
However, should we also filter out the facility by type =
"WAREHOUSE"? (if this is not already done)
This would be good for purchasing inventory, but for supplies and
other purchases you would probably want more flexibility here to be
+1
However, should we also filter out the facility by type = "WAREHOUSE"?
(if this is not already done)
Jacopo
David E Jones wrote:
On Oct 31, 2006, at 10:55 PM, Anil Patel wrote:
Hi,
In create PO Process, Ship-To Settings screen Presents List of all the
facilities, This list can be long
Jacopo,
Yes, this makes sense. Just get and show all messages. You might want
to filter out duplicate messages, ie the same as another message
already in the list.
BTW, a success message could be an individual message as well as the
list of messages.
-David
On Nov 1, 2006, at 2:06 AM
On Oct 31, 2006, at 10:55 PM, Anil Patel wrote:
Hi,
In create PO Process, Ship-To Settings screen Presents List of all the
facilities, This list can be long and have facilities that may
never have
Shipping address, Like in our case Parking lots are facilities,
Electrical
Sub Stations are f
What do you think of the attached patch?
The success message list is pulled from the services (invoked thru the
service-multi handler) so that the messages returned by the services are
shown on screen: this will make the output a bit more verbose
(especially if you submit big lists of services
+1
Anil
On 11/1/06, Ashish Vijaywargiya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
--- David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Another, and hopefully the last, Test Snapshot
> Release is now
> available for voting.
>
> Please vote on this using the common Apache style,
> with a +1, 0, or
> -1. Once
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-418?page=all ]
Jacopo Cappellato resolved OFBIZ-418.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Migration of Cache Maintenance Page from JSPs to Screen Widget
> --
>
>
+1
--- David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Another, and hopefully the last, Test Snapshot
> Release is now
> available for voting.
>
> Please vote on this using the common Apache style,
> with a +1, 0, or
> -1. Once we have approved another TS release we will
> submit it to the
>
Everything is working fine for me.
So I will give +1.
On 11/1/06, Jacopo Cappellato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The voting is going to close, if you want to express your opinion/review
please vote now.
Jacopo
David E Jones wrote:
>
> Another, and hopefully the last, Test Snapshot Release is n
The voting is going to close, if you want to express your opinion/review
please vote now.
Jacopo
David E Jones wrote:
Another, and hopefully the last, Test Snapshot Release is now available
for voting.
Please vote on this using the common Apache style, with a +1, 0, or -1.
Once we have a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-418?page=comments#action_12446173 ]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-418:
-
Before Marco spends too much time in the conversion, I'm wondering if there are
some pages that we can simply dis
From: "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Oct 31, 2006, at 4:22 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
> > It's because I tested before with non-defined language that I made
> > this conclusions.
>
> What do you mean by this? What does it mean to test with a non-
> defined language?
I was not t
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-418?page=comments#action_12446171 ]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-418:
-
Marco,
your patches and files are in svn with revisions: 469808, 469809 and 469812.
I did some formatting changes
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-418?page=all ]
Jacopo Cappellato reassigned OFBIZ-418:
---
Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato
> Migration of Cache Maintenance Page from JSPs to Screen Widget
>
71 matches
Mail list logo
