> This ublox modem does not indicate change of registration. And its seems
> like its not running on another
> bearer because then I would assume CGATT would work(?).
>
I meant CGACT not CGATT.
--Richard
>
___
ofono mailing list -- ofono@ofono.org
To
Hi Denis,
Den ons 11 dec. 2019 kl 22:09 skrev Denis Kenzior :
> >
> > It looked like this:
> > 12:03:18 ofonod[547]: Aux: < \r\n+CIEV: 2,3\r\n
> > 12:03:23 ofonod[547]: Aux: < \r\n+CIEV: 2,2\r\n
> >
> > Deactivated
>
> Shouldn't we get a CREG actually? That tells us we're not connected at
>
Hi Richard,
On 12/11/19 1:13 PM, richard.rojf...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Richard Röjfors
To be considered attached on LTE a context should be activated.
But in case the context got deactivated we did not update
the attached state, it remained attached.
That caused the connection manager to try
Hi Richard,
On 12/10/19 6:58 AM, richard.rojf...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Richard Röjfors
Applied, thanks.
Regards,
-Denis
___
ofono mailing list -- ofono@ofono.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ofono-le...@ofono.org
From: Richard Röjfors
To be considered attached on LTE a context should be activated.
But in case the context got deactivated we did not update
the attached state, it remained attached.
That caused the connection manager to try to re-activate the
context manually, but for LTE thats done
