First, an issue that is incredibly minor, and I think I know the answer...
If I draw from a source using version 1.0 of the license, need I list it
alongside 1.0a in Section 15? It's been suggested otherwise, the basis
being that we're supposed to reproduce the *exact text* of the sources
copyrigh
> In this case, since the name was "developed"
> independent of knowing the
> original name, can I release it as OGC?
No, that isnt "independent development."
> Would these be
> considered violating the PI statement? They are
> * Weapon of Shadow
Probably not. That is actually a new name.
>
Personally, I'd save myself all the fuss, call it "umbral weapon," and
be done with it.
John W. Mangrum
___
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
I thought I'd ask the community their thoughts on this:
A spell that has been submitted to the D20 Exchange comes from a book that
declares all it's spell names as PI, and then provides a license to use that
spell name (as long as it's marked as PI, and proper attribution is given to
the copyright
On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 07:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does "use" in this context mean "read", "use in a game", etc.?
No. That's why it is a defined term.
Ryan
___
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/lis
>That is: are the end-user of a work published by the OGL also bound by the
OGL?
Nope...
~Jimmy Domsalla
qtgg.icehex.net
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 10:15 AM
Subject: [Ogf-l] OGL - definition 1g
> Hi,
>
> I hav
Hi,
I have a question. In paragraph 1 of the OGL item "g" is defined as <<"Use",
"Used" or "Using" means to use, Distribute, copy, edit, format, modify,
translate and otherwise create Derivative Material of Open Game Content>>
Does "use" in this context mean "read", "use in a game", etc.? That
