Re: [Ogf-l] How to revise the OGL

2004-04-27 Thread HUDarklord
In a message dated 4/27/2004 7:04:18 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It seems to me that much of the local traffic is speculation, an appropriate intellectual tool to be using in an emerging field. While I don't agree with you that footnoting and attribution is a top concern r

Re: [Ogf-l] How to revise the OGL

2004-04-27 Thread Tavis Allison
On April 26, 2004 at 10:48 PM, Bruce Baugh wrote: > One of the things we've collectively learned is that demands that X or > Y be done or it's DOOM FOR US ALL never pan out. If requests and > discussion get you nowhere, threats _really_ won't get you anywhere > you'd like to go. There is certainly