> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Spike Y Jones
> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 1:45 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Ogf-l] Section 5
>
> > If I try to copy/derive from/distribute something that
> isn't mine
In a message dated 2/20/2004 11:19:29 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This actually extends beyond Closed/PI content; For instance, converting a
creature from Palladium (where OGC/PI are meaningless terms) and publishing
it as OGC (without specific license from Palladium to do
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:31:59 +
Rob Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If I try to copy/derive from/distribute something that isn't mine
> to do so, it's not legal anyway.
>
> Does section 5 simply make this explicit to people (which is still
> a good thing, as many people don't seem to get
On 20 Feb 2004, at 16:23, Spike Y Jones wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:18:32 -0500
"jdomsalla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My reading of this is that it makes explicit that you are in the
wrong if you take someone else's Closed Content or Product
Identity, reprint it in you book, and then declare it
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:18:32 -0500
"jdomsalla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My reading of this is that it makes explicit that you are in the
> > wrong if you take someone else's Closed Content or Product
> > Identity, reprint it in you book, and then declare it to be
> > Open Content.
>
> This
Friday, February 20, 2004 5:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Ogf-l] Section 5
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Rob Myers wrote:
>
> > I've a question about section 5 of the OGL: "Representation of
> > authority to contribute".
> > Surely by publishing something you are implicitly clai
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Rob Myers wrote:
> I've a question about section 5 of the OGL: "Representation of
> authority to contribute".
> Surely by publishing something you are implicitly claiming that you
> have the right to do so? Does an explicit claim that you are the author
> or hold the rights
Hello to the list.
I've a question about section 5 of the OGL: "Representation of
authority to contribute".
Surely by publishing something you are implicitly claiming that you
have the right to do so? Does an explicit claim that you are the author
or hold the rights simply make this clear to th
